Evaluation of Safety and Clinically Relevant Drug–Drug Interactions with Tucatinib in Healthy Volunteers

Phase I Clinical Study

The study protocol and amendments were reviewed and approved by a central institutional review board. All participants provided written informed consent for participation and publication. This study was conducted in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonisation Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice.

Participants

Healthy adults aged 18–65 years, with a body mass index of 18.0–32.0 kg/m2, were included. Exclusion criteria included use of tobacco or other nicotine-containing products within 3 months prior to study initiation; consumption of alcohol within 48 h prior to study initiation and throughout the study; routine or chronic use of acetaminophen at a dose of > 3 g/day; and use of prescribed or over-the-counter medication, health supplements, or herbal remedies within 28 days prior to study initiation through to follow-up.

Study Design

This phase I, multicenter, open-label, fixed-sequence study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03723395) was conducted in five parts (A–E; Fig. 1). Participants were confined to the clinical research center on the day before initiating treatment until the day of clinic discharge.

Fig. 1figure 1

Study schematics for assessing A the effect of comedications on tucatinib plasma exposure, and B the effect of steady-state tucatinib on the plasma exposure of co-administered drugs. BID twice daily, D day, ITZ itraconazole, MDZ midazolam, PK pharmacokinetics, QD once daily, RIF rifampin, TUC tucatinib

Part A evaluated the effect of the strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, itraconazole, on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of tucatinib. Participants received a single 300 mg dose of tucatinib administered orally 2 h after breakfast on days 1 and 6. A 200 mg dose of itraconazole was administered orally twice daily immediately after a meal on day 3 and once daily immediately after breakfast on days 4–7 (Fig. 1A). Participants were discharged from the clinic on day 8 and were assessed at a follow-up visit on day 12 (±1 day).

Part B evaluated the effect of rifampin, a strong inducer of CYP3A4 and CYP2C8, on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of tucatinib. Participants received a single, 300 mg dose of tucatinib administered orally on days 1 and 10, following an overnight fast of at least 8 h. A 600 mg dose of rifampin was administered orally once daily on days 3–11, following an overnight fast of at least 8 h (Fig. 1A). Participants were discharged from the clinic on day 12 and were assessed at a follow-up visit on day 16 (± 1 day).

Part C evaluated the effect of the strong CYP2C8 inhibitor gemfibrozil on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of tucatinib. Participants received a single 300 mg dose of tucatinib administered orally on days 1 and 7, following an overnight fast of at least 8 h. A 600 mg dose of gemfibrozil was administered orally twice daily on days 3–8, following an overnight fast of at least 8 h in the morning and approximately 30 minutes prior to the evening meal (Fig. 1A). Participants were discharged from the clinic on day 9 and were assessed at a follow-up visit on day 13 (± 1 day).

Part D evaluated the effects of steady-state tucatinib on the pharmacokinetics of substrate probes of CYP2C8 (repaglinide), CYP2C9 (tolbutamide), and CYP3A4 (midazolam). Participants received a single 0.5 mg dose of repaglinide administered orally on days 1 and 11, following an overnight fast. A 500 mg dose of tolbutamide and a 2 mg dose of midazolam were co-administered orally on days 2 and 12, following an overnight fast. A 300 mg dose of tucatinib was administered orally twice daily, at least 12 h apart, on days 4–13. On days 4, 10, 11, and 12, the morning dose was given after an overnight fast of at least 8 h. On days 11 and 12, the morning dose was given immediately after administration of repaglinide and tolbutamide/midazolam, respectively (Fig. 1B). Participants were discharged from the clinic on day 14 and were assessed at a follow-up visit on day 21 (±1 day).

Part E evaluated the effect of steady-state tucatinib on the pharmacokinetics of a substrate probe of P-gp (digoxin). Participants received a single, 0.5 mg dose of digoxin administered orally on days 1 and 15, following an overnight fast of at least 8 h. Tucatinib 300 mg was administered orally twice daily, at least 12 h apart, on days 8–21. On days 8, 14, and 15, the morning dose was given after an overnight fast of at least 8 h. On day 15, the morning dose was administered immediately after digoxin (Fig. 1B). Participants were discharged from the clinic on day 22 and were assessed at a follow-up visit on day 29 (± 1 day).

Foods and beverages containing poppy seeds, grapefruit, or Seville oranges were not allowed from 7 days prior to day −1 until the follow-up visit or early study termination. While confined to the study site, participants received a standardized diet at scheduled times that did not conflict with other study-related activities. All oral study drugs were administered with 240 mL of room-temperature water. When drugs were administered concurrently, only 240 mL of water was administered in total for all drugs. Participants were dosed upright in a seated position.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Assessments

Blood samples for tucatinib and probe drug pharmacokinetics were collected pre-dose and at intervals as indicated in Supplementary Fig. S1 for parts A–E. In parts A–C, blood samples for determination of plasma concentrations of tucatinib and ONT-993 were collected at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48 h post-dose on days 1 and 6 (Part A) or day 10 (Part B) or day 7 (Part C). In Parts B and C, the 48-h post-dose timepoint relevant to day 1 dosing of tucatinib was collected prior to dosing on day 3 of rifampin (Part B) or gemfibrozil (Part C). A single blood sample was collected prior to dosing for determination of trough plasma concentrations on days 4–6 for itraconazole dosing in Part A, on days 8–10 for rifampin dosing in Part B, and on days 5–7 for gemfibrozil in Part C.

In Part D, blood samples for determination of plasma concentrations of repaglinide were collected at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h post-dose on days 1 and 11. Blood samples for determination of plasma concentrations of midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam were collected at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, and 24 h post-dose on days 2 and 12. Blood samples for tolbutamide and 4-hydroxytolbutamide were collected at the same timepoints and also at 36 and 48 h post-dose. The 48-h post-dose timepoint relative to day 2 dosing was collected prior to the morning dose of tucatinib on day 4. In Part E, blood samples for determination of plasma concentrations of digoxin were collected at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 h post-dose on days 1 and 15. In Parts D and E, blood samples for determination of plasma concentrations of tucatinib and ONT-993 were collected at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h after the morning dose of tucatinib on days 4, 10, 11, and 12 (Part D) or days 8, 14, and 15 (Part E). The 12-h post-dose samples were collected prior to administration of the second daily dose of tucatinib.

Quantitative Assays

Plasma concentrations of tucatinib, ONT-993, itraconazole, rifampin, gemfibrozil, repaglinide, tolbutamide, 4­hydroxytolbutamide, midazolam, 1-hydroxymidazolam, and digoxin were determined using validated bioanalytical procedures, performed by Covance (Madison, WI, USA).

Protein precipitation was used for extraction of tucatinib, ONT-993, itraconazole, gemfibrozil, rifampin, tolbutamide, and 4-hydroxytolbutamide; liquid-liquid extraction for midazolam, 1-hydroxymidazolam, and digoxin; and supported-liquid extraction for repaglinide. Analyte detection and quantification was carried out by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as described in the Data Supplement. Details of the reference analytes and internal standards are given in Supplementary Table S1 (see electronic supplementary material [ESM]).

Laboratory Evaluations and Safety Assessments

Blood and urine samples were collected, after at least an 8-h fast, for clinical laboratory evaluations at specific times during the study for Parts A–E. Clinical chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis evaluations were performed at screening, check-in, and follow-up, and regularly at protocol-specified timepoints in all parts of the study. Assays for cystatin C and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio were performed at all these timepoints except screening in Part D, and for all but the first six patients enrolled in Part E, following a protocol amendment.

Safety assessments included recording of all treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), clinical laboratory parameters, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram, and physical examination.

Statistical Analysis

Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted by Covance Early Clinical Biometrics using WinNonlin Version 8.1 (Certara L.P., Princeton, NJ, USA). Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined, as appropriate, from the plasma concentrations of tucatinib, concomitant drugs, and metabolites using non-compartmental methods.

The pharmacokinetic parameters were area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to the last available measurement (AUC0–last), area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0–inf), and maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) for tucatinib, repaglinide, tolbutamide, midazolam, and digoxin. A linear mixed-model analysis was applied to analyze the natural log-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters, which included treatment as a fixed effect and subject as a random effect. The impact of drug co-administration on the pharmacokinetic parameters for each part of the study was assessed by deriving estimates of geometric mean ratios, together with the corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs), for comparison between reference and test timepoints (days 1 and 6 in Part A, days 1 and 10 in Part B, days 1 and 7 in Part C, days 1 and 11 for repaglinide and days 2 and 12 for tolbutamide and midazolam in Part D, and days 1 and 15 for digoxin in Part E). Exploratory analyses of the geometric mean ratios and 90% CIs of AUC0–inf, AUC0–last, and Cmax for metabolites ONT-993, 4-hydroxytolbutamide, and 1-hydroxymidazolam were evaluated as required.

Other pharmacokinetic parameters estimated by noncompartmental analysis included time to Cmax, terminal elimination half-life, apparent total clearance (tucatinib, repaglinide, tolbutamide, midazolam, and digoxin), apparent total clearance at steady state (tucatinib in Parts D and E only), metabolic ratio based on AUC0–inf, and metabolic ratio based on Cmax.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif