A comprehensive evaluation of minimally invasive Achilles tendon reconstruction with hamstring graft indicates satisfactory long-term outcomes

Abstract

Given the relevance of the Achilles tendon in proper function of the foot and ankle, the primary goal of the present study was to use a holistic approach for a comprehensive evaluation of Achil-les tendon reconstruction results on multiple levels. 30 patients with partial or total Achilles ten-don tears were subjected to the minimally invasive Achilles tendon reconstruction. Patients were then subjected to the clinical, functional and isokinetic tests 12 and 24 months after the treatment. The overall results of this extensive evaluation are highly satisfactory and patients returned to their normal physical activity.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Bioethic Committee of Karol Marcinkowski Medical University in Poznań, by resolution no. 743/20.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif