Detection of maternal serum unmetabolized folic acid following multivitamin and mineral supplementation with or without folic acid after 12 weeks' gestation: a randomized controlled trial.

Abstract

Background: Pregnant women are advised to take folic acid supplements before conception and during the first three months of pregnancy. Many women continue folic acid supplementation throughout pregnancy, and concerns have been raised about associations between excess folic acid intake and adverse child health outcomes. Unmetabolized folic acid (UMFA) is found in serum at higher folic acid intakes and has been proposed as a biomarker for excess folic acid intake. Objective: To determine if removing folic acid from prenatal multivitamin and mineral supplements after 12 weeks of pregnancy reduces concentrations of serum UMFA at 36 weeks′ gestation. Design: A double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Women with a singleton pregnancy 12-16-weeks′ gestation were randomly assigned to a multi-micronutrient supplement containing no folic acid (intervention) or 800 μg folic acid/day (control) from enrolment until 36 weeks′ gestation. Maternal serum was analyzed for UMFA and secondary outcomes of red blood cell and serum folate at 36 weeks′ gestation. Results: UMFA was detected in most of the 103 randomized women (86% >limit of detection). However, only 12% (n=11/90) of serum samples were above the limit of quantification (0.55 nmol/L), preventing analysis of UMFA concentrations. Fewer women had detectable UMFA in the no folic acid group compared to the 800 μg folic acid group (72% [n=33/46] vs. 98% [n=43/44]; p = 0.001). Maternal serum and red blood cell folate concentrations were lower in the no folic acid intervention group compared to the control group (median 23.2 vs. 49.3 nmol/L, 1335 vs. 1914 nmol/L, respectively; p< 0.,001) and no woman was classified as folate deficient. Conclusions: Removing folic acid from prenatal multivitamin and mineral supplements reduced the number of women with detectable UMFA at 36 weeks′ gestation, however, differences in UMFA concentration between treatment groups were not quantifiable.

Competing Interest Statement

SW serves as a consultant at InovoBiologic Inc, AB, Canada. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Clinical Trial

ACTRN12619001511123

Clinical Protocols

https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/11/e040416

Funding Statement

This study was supported by grants from The Adelaide Women's and Children's Hospital Foundation and a SAHMRI Early Career Researcher Seed Grant. MS is supported by an Ella McKnight Scholarship from the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. KPB is supported by a Women's and Children's Hospital Foundation MS McLeod Postdoctoral Research Fellowship. DCS is supported by the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship from The University of Adelaide. TRS is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Emerging Leadership Investigator Grant. DJP is supported by an NHMRC, Medical Research Futures Fund (MRFF) Career Development Fellowship. MM is supported by NHMRC Principal Research Fellowship.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Ethics Committee of Women's and Children's Health Network Research (HREC/19/WCHN/018) and Flinders Medical Centre (SSA/20/SAC/61) gave ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data described in the manuscript, code book, and analytic code will be made available upon request, pending submission of a proposal and subsequent approval by the Trial Steering Committee. Please forward requests to karen.best@sahmri.com

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif