Determinants of healthcare employee preference to continue teleworking after the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study using hierarchical regression

Abstract

Employee post-pandemic telework preference is an important consideration for navigating post-pandemic work arrangements and can inform organizational planning and workforce management. A cross-sectional survey of employees (n=400, participation rate =36.4%) of a regional health authority who teleworked during the COVID-19 pandemic was conducted. The most common post-pandemic telework preference was all the time (52%) followed by over half but not all the time (32%) and less than half the time or not at all (16%). Using hierarchical multinomial logistic regression models and less than half the time or not at all as the reference outcome, being a provider of direct patient care and productivity while teleworking were strong determinants of post-pandemic telework preference while two or more weekly teleconference hours, work-life balance and having one or more people over five years of age in the home while teleworking were moderate determinants.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Andrea Jones, Jonathan Fan, and Christopher McLeod are supported by research operating funds through the Partnership for Work Health and Safety - a research partnership between WorkSafeBC and the University of British Columbia. Christopher McLeod and Wei Zhang are partially support by a Michael Smith Health Research BC Scholar Award.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The UBC Behavioural Research Ethics Board and the Fraser Health Research Ethics Board gave ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

In accordance with the ethics agreement and to protect participant anonymity, data is not available for sharing.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif