Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more
CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price. Access via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing Of this article Organize, annotate And mark up articles Printing And downloading restrictions apply Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more Select* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.
Article / Publication Details AbstractAbstract This study explored the application of a model for teaching tooth wear diagnosis, risk assessment and treatment decisions to undergraduates at the UCLouvain, Belgium, based on inverted classroom combined with case presentations. The aim was to explain its implementation and assess improvement in learning, engagement and satisfaction. The hypothesis tested was that this model would enhance students’ performance. This controlled clinical trial included 29 dental students in the test group and 30 in the control group. All students received instructions and pre-class material for reading via e-mail two weeks prior to class time (T0). The test group included students attending the class time (attendance was not obligatory). The control group consisted of students only attending the pre-clinical training (attendance was obligatory). Both groups assessed case three presentations with no, moderate and severe erosive tooth wear. The test group assessed the cases at the beginning of the class time (T1). One week later, at the beginning of the pre-clinical training, the students of the control group assessed the case presentations (T2). In parallel, to measure the contribution of the class time to students‘ performance, the test group re-assessed the cases (T2). This was followed by discussion of each case in which the lecturer presented the benchmark assessments. Students’ perception of their learning experience was recorded. The generalized linear mixed regression model showed that for the overall assessments of cases, students in the control group were significantly less likely to agree with the benchmark than students in the test group (OR=0.62; p=0.006). Students’ satisfaction was higher in the test group than the control group, but only significantly regarding the quality of the cases presentations (Fisher test p
S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
留言 (0)