Differences in olfactory sensitivity and odor detection correlate with foraging task specialization in honeybees Apis mellifera

ElsevierVolume 141, August–September 2022, 104416Journal of Insect PhysiologyHighlights•

Pollen and nectar honeybee foragers differ in their sensitivity to odors.

Pollen foragers do better in conditioning at low odor concentrations.

Pollen foragers' antennae show stronger EAG signals for floral odors.

Pollen volatiles evoke EAG signals with hyper and depolarization components.

Antennal response to pollen odors differs among foraging types.

Abstract

Division of labor is central to the ecological success of social insects. Among honeybees foragers, specialization for collecting nectar or pollen correlates with their sensitivity to gustatory stimuli (e.g. sugars). We hypothesize that pollen and nectar foragers also differ in their sensitivity to odors, and therefore in their likelihood to show odor-mediated responses. To assess foragerś sensitivity to natural odors, we quantified the conditioning of the proboscis extension reflex (PER) to increasing concentrations (0.001; 0.01; 0.1; 1 M) of linalool or nonanal. Furthermore, we compared electroantennogram (EAG) recordings to correlate bees’ conditioned responses with the electrophysiological responses of their antennae. To further explore differences of the antennal response of foragers in relation to task-related odors, we registered EAG signals for two behaviorally ‘‘meaningful’’ odors that mediate pollen collection: fresh pollen odors and the brood pheromone (E)-β-ocimene. Pollen foragers performed better than nectar foragers in PER conditioning trials when linalool and nonanal were presented at low concentrations (0.001, 0.01 M). Consistently, their antennae showed stronger EAG signals (higher amplitudes) to these odors, suggesting that differences in sensitivity can be explained at the periphery of the olfactory system. Pollen and nectar foragers detect pollen odors differently, but not (E)-β-ocimene. Pollen volatiles evoked EAG signals with hyper and depolarization components. In pollen foragers, the contribution of the hyperpolarization component was higher than in nectar foragers. We discuss our findings in terms of adaptive advantages to learn subtle olfactory cues that influence the ability to better identify/discriminate food sources.

Keywords

Foraging division of labor

Odor Sensitivity

Honeybee (Apis mellifera L)

Electroantennography (EAG)

Pollen volatiles

View full text

© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif