Association of enteral feeding with microaspiration in critically ill adults

Elsevier

Available online 30 June 2022, 151611

Applied Nursing ResearchHighlights•

Gastric microaspiration occurred in 39 % of mechanically ventilated patients.

Average onset of microaspiration was within 24 h of starting enteral feeding.

Feeding tubes were post-pyloric during more than half of the microaspiration events.

Patients not receiving enteral feeding were more likely to be abundant aspirators.

Perform microaspiration prevention strategies with or without feeding

AbstractAim

This study explored relationships between enteral feeding and tracheal pepsin A.

Background

Mechanically ventilated (MV) patients receiving enteral feeding are at risk for microaspiration. Tracheal pepsin A, an enzyme specific to gastric cells, was a proxy for microaspiration of gastric secretions.

Methods

Secondary analysis of RCT data from critically ill, MV adults was conducted. Microaspiration prevention included elevated head of bed, endotracheal tube cuff pressure management, and regular oral care. Tracheal secretions for pepsin A were collected every 12 h. Microaspiration was defined as pepsin A ≥ 6.25 ng/mL. Positive pepsin A in >30 % of individual tracheal samples was defined as abundant microaspiration (frequent aspirator). Chi-squared, Fisher's Exact test, and generalized linear model (GLM) were used.

Results

Tracheal pepsin A was present in 111/283 (39 %) mechanically ventilated patients and 48 (17 %) had abundant microaspiration. Enteral feeding was associated with tracheal pepsin A, which occurred within 24 h of enteral feeding. Of the patients who aspirated, the majority received some enteral feeding 96/111 (86 %), compared to only 15/111 (14 %) who received no feeding. A greater number of positive pepsin A events occurred with post-pyloric feeding tube location (55.6 %) vs. gastric (48.6 %), although significant only at the event-level. Frequent aspirators (abundant pepsin A) had higher pepsin A levels compared to infrequent aspirators.

Conclusions

Our findings confirmed the stomach as the microaspiration source. Contrary to other studies, distal feeding tube location did not mitigate microaspiration. Timing for first positive pepsin A should be studied for possible association with enteral feeding intolerance.

Keywords

Pepsin A

Microaspiration

Enteral feeding

Critical care

Mechanical ventilation

© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif