World Health Organization. Hypertension. In: Overview. 2021. https://www.who.int/health-topics/hypertension#tab=tab_1. (Accessed 9 Jun 2021).

Carretero AO, Oparil S. Clinical cardiology: new frontiers. Circulation. 2000;101:329–35.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Messerli FH, Williams B, Ritz E. Essential hypertension. Lancet. 2007;370:591–603.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Manosroi W, Williams GH. Genetics of human primary hypertension: focus on hormonal mechanisms. Endocr Rev. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2018-00071.

Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Onusko E. Diagnosing secondary hypertension. Am Fam Physician. 2003;67:67–74.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Charles L, Triscott J, Dobbs B. AFP-secondary HTN – discovering the underlying cause. Am Fam Physician. 2017;96:453–61.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cai L, Zhu Y. The challenges of data quality and data quality assessment in the big data era. Data Sci J. 2015;14:1–10.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

de Moraes Batista AF, Chiavegatto Filho AD. Machine learning aplicado à Saúde. Workshop: Machine Learning. 19° Simpósio Bras. Comput Apl à Saúde. Soc Bras Comput. 2019.

van de Schoot R, de Bruin J, Schram R, et al. An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews. Nat Mach Intell. 2021;3:125–33.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kumar V. Feature selection: a literature review. Smart Comput Rev. 2014. https://doi.org/10.6029/smartcr.2014.03.007.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kwong EWY, Wu H, Pang GKH. A prediction model of blood pressure for telemedicine. Health Informatics J. 2018;24:227–44.

Article  Google Scholar 

•• Sakr S, Elshawi R, Ahmed A, Qureshi WT, Brawner C, Keteyian S, et al. Using machine learning on cardiorespiratory fitness data for predicting hypertension: the Henry Ford exercise testing (FIT) Project. PLoS One. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195344. The model was constructed using the Henry Ford Health System dataset containing 23,095 samples. After applying an information gain-based feature selection, the best model was obtained by the random forest algorithm, achieving an AUROC of 0.880 in the test set (20% of the sample).

Ma Y, Yang B, Kang G, Hou B. Hypertension warning model based on random forest and distance metrics. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) 2018;2274–2279.

Heo BM, Ryu KH. Prediction of prehypertenison and hypertension based on anthropometry, blood parameters, and spirometry. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112571.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nour M, Polat K. Automatic classification of hypertension types based on personal features by machine learning algorithms. Math Probl Eng. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2742781.

Article  Google Scholar 

•• Ye C, Fu T, Hao S, et al. Prediction of incident hypertension within the next year: prospective study using statewide electronic health records and machine learning J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(e22). The authors developed an analysis from the Maine Health Information Exchange Network, an American dataset with eighty features. Two cohort studies were used, one for training the model and the other for its validation. XGBoost achieved the best performance, with an AUROC of 0.917.

•• Ijaz MF, Alfian G, Syafrudin M, Rhee J. Hybrid prediction model for type 2 diabetes and hypertension using DBSCAN-based outlier detection, synthetic minority over sampling technique (SMOTE), and random forest. Appl Sci. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8081325. This article applied machine learning to predict type 2 diabetes and hypertension while using DBSCAN for outlier detection, SMOTE for balancing the data, and random forest as the predictive algorithm. They used a dataset from a private university in Brazil for the hypertension model with 155 samples. The model achieved an accuracy of 0.76, but the AUROC result was not presented.

•• Nusinovici S, Tham YC, Chak Yan MY, Wei Ting DS, Li J, Sabanayagam C, et al. Logistic regression was as good as machine learning for predicting major chronic diseases. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;122:56–69. This article used a dataset from Singapore to predict hypertension. Clinical and sociodemographic features were included and selected by the z-statistic value from logistic regression. The best performance was achieved with the support vector machine algorithm (AUROC = 0.780).

•• Pei Z, Liu J, Liu M, Zhou W, Yan P, Wen S, et al. Risk-predicting model for incident of essential hypertension based on environmental and genetic factors with support vector machine. Interdiscip Sci Comput Life Sci. 2018;10:126–130. This study analyzed a Chinese dataset with 1200 observations. The authors developed a prediction model based on environmental and genetic factors, and the best algorithm was the support vector machine with an AUROC of 0.886.

Kanegae H, Suzuki K, Fukatani K, Ito T, Harada N, Kario K. Highly precise risk prediction model for new-onset hypertension using artificial intelligence techniques. J Clin Hypertens. 2020;22:445–50.

Article  Google Scholar 

Soh DCK, Ng EYK, Jahmunah V, Oh SL, San TR, Acharya UR. A computational intelligence tool for the detection of hypertension using empirical mode decomposition. Comput Biol Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103630.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xu F, Zhu J, Sun N, et al. Development and validation of prediction models for hypertension risks in rural Chinese populations. J Glob Health. 2019. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.09.020601.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Li C, Sun D, Liu J, Li M, Zhang B, Liu Y, et al. A prediction model of essential hypertension based on genetic and environmental risk factors in northern Han Chinese. Int J Med Sci. 2019;16:793–9.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Zhang L, Yuan M, An Z, et al. Prediction of hypertension, hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia from retinal fundus photographs via deep learning: a cross-sectional study of chronic diseases in central China. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:1–11.

CAS  Google Scholar 

López-Martínez F, Núñez-Valdez ER, Crespo RG, García-Díaz V. An artificial neural network approach for predicting hypertension using NHANES data. Sci Rep. 2020;10:10620.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ambika M, Raghuraman G, SaiRamesh L. Enhanced decision support system to predict and prevent hypertension using computational intelligence techniques. Soft Comput. 2020;24:13293–304.

Article  Google Scholar 

AlKaabi LA, Ahmed LS, Al Attiyah MF, Abdel-Rahman ME. Predicting hypertension using machine learning: findings from Qatar Biobank Study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15: e0240370.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Marin I, Goga N. Hypertension detection based on machine learning. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2019;1–4.

• Boutilier JJ, Chan TCY, Ranjan M, Deo S. Risk stratification for early detection of diabetes and hypertension in resource-limited settings: machine learning analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021. https://doi.org/10.2196/20123. This is the most recent article identified by our systematic review. The authors used a dataset collected by community health workers in the urban slums of Hyderabad (India). The random forest algorithm obtained the best performance with an AUROC of 0.792, considering a 25-iterative 10-fold cross-validation.

Patnaik R, Chandran M, Lee SC, Gupta A, Kim C, Kim C. Predicting the occurrence of essential hypertension using annual health records. In 2018 Second International Conference on Advances in Electronics, Computers and Communications (ICAECC) IEEE 2018;1–5

Liu Y, Li S, Jiang H, Wang J. Exploring the relationship between hypertension and nutritional ingredients intake with machine learning. Healthc Technol Lett. 2020;7:103–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–52.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

England TN. Numb Er 18 of cardiovascular disease. English J. 2001;345:1291–7.

Google Scholar 

Giles TD, Berk BC, Black HR, Cohn JN, Kostis JB, Izzo JL Jr, et al. Expanding the definition and classification of hypertension. J Clin Hypertens. 2005;7:505–12.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kononenko I. Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective. Artif Intell Med. 2001;23:89–109.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Nisbet R, Elder J, Miner GD. Handbook of statistical analysis and data mining applications. Academic Press; 2009.

Google Scholar