Correction: Evaluation of antigen-detecting and antibody-detecting diagnostic test combinations for diagnosing melioidosis

S2 Table contains errors in the ‘Cases’ and ‘Sensitivity’ columns, including the ‘No. of cases with positive results’, the ‘No. of cases with negative results’, and the ‘No. of cases with positive results/N (in the parentheses)’. The correct S2 Table can be viewed below.

S3 Table contains two wrong percentage point calculations for the values ‘(41/87)’ and ‘(56/99)’. The correct S3 Table can be viewed below.

S4 Table contains three wrong percentage point calculations for the values ‘(162/169)’, ‘(167/169)’, and ‘(122/123)’. The correct S4 Table can be viewed below.

Reference1. Amornchai P, Hantrakun V, Wongsuvan G, Wuthiekanun V, Wongratanacheewin S, Teparrakkul P, et al. (2021) Evaluation of antigen-detecting and antibody-detecting diagnostic test combinations for diagnosing melioidosis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 15(11): e0009840. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009840 pmid:34727111

Citation: The PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases Staff (2022) Correction: Evaluation of antigen-detecting and antibody-detecting diagnostic test combinations for diagnosing melioidosis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 16(6): e0010095. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010095

Published: June 2, 2022

Copyright: © 2022 The PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases Staff. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif