Non-inferiority of silver diamine fluoride for caries prevention when applied by nurses compared to dental hygienists: Results from the CariedAway school-based clinical trial

Abstract

Background The sustainability of school-based caries prevention programs depends on the utilization of effective, efficient treatments and the availability of trained clinicians. The objective of this study was to determine whether registered nurses are non-inferior to dental hygienists in the application and effectiveness of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) for dental caries.

Methods CariedAway was a school-based cluster-randomized trial of SDF versus dental sealants and atraumatic restorations. Within the SDF arm, subjects were treated by either a licensed dental hygienist or a registered nurse, both under the supervision of a pediatric dentist. The proportion of children who remained caries free after two years was analyzed using two-group proportion tests, adjusting for the clustering effect of schools.

Results 417 children were analyzed including 298 treated by hygienists and 119 by nurses. The proportion of caries-free individuals was 0.812 and 0.798 for hygienists and nurses, respectively, for a difference of 0.014 (95% CI = -0.07, 0.098) and within the pre-determined non-inferiority margin.

Conclusions Results support silver diamine fluo-ride and fluoride varnish delivery by both dental hygienists and nurses in school-based oral health programs.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

NCT03442309

Clinical Protocols

https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-018-2891-1

Funding Statement

Research reported in this publication was funded through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) award (PCS-1609-36824). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the official views of the funding organization, New York University, or the NYU College of Dentistry.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

CariedAway is a registered study at www.clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT03442309) and received ethical approval from the New York University School of Medicine IRB (#i17-00578).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

CariedAway is an ongoing clinical trial. Data are not publicly available. Data requests will be considered on a case by case basis.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif