Comprehension processes on question-answering activities: A think-aloud study

Anderson, J. R. (2015). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Worth Publishers.

Bjork, E. L., Little, J. L., & Storm, B. C. (2014). Multiple-choice testing as a desirable difficulty in the classroom. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(3), 165-170. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.03.002.

Cerdán, R., Gilabert, R., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2011). Selecting information to answer questions: Strategic individual differences when searching texts. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 201–205. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.007

Cerdán, R., Pérez, A., Vidal-Abarca, E., & Rouet, J-F. (2019). To answer questions from text, one has to understand what the question is asking: Differential effects of question aids as a function of com-prehension skill. Reading and Writing, 32, 2111–2124. doi:10.1007/s11145-019-09943-w

Cerdán, R., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2008). The effects of tasks on integrating information from multiple documents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 209–222.

Coté, N., Goldman, S. R., & Saul, E. U. (1998). Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation. Discourse Processes, 25(1), 1-53. doi:10.1080/01638539809545019

Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. CA: Sage Publications.

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

Farr, R., Pritchard, R., & Smitten, B. (1990). A description of what happens when an examinee takes a multiple-choice reading comprehension test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27(3), 209-226. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1990.tb00744.x

Ferrer, A., Vidal-Abarca, E., Serrano, M-Á., & Gilabert, R. (2017). Impact of text availability and question format on reading comprehension processes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 404-415. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.10.002

Fox, M. C., Ericsson, K. A., & Best, R. (2011). Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 316-344. doi:10.1037/a0021663

Gil, L., Martínez, T., & Vidal-Abarca (2015). Online assessment of strategic reading literacy skills. Com-puters & Education, 82, 50–59. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.026

Hannon, B. & Daneman, M. (2004). Shallow semantic processing of text: An individual-differences ac-count. Discourse Processes, 37(3), 187-204. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3703_1

International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) (2016). PIRLS 2016 As-sessment Framework. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College. Retrieved from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2016/framework.html

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lane, S. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2004). Skimming the surface: Verbal overshadowing of analogical retrieval. Psychological Science, 15(11), 715-719. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00747.x

Llorens, A. C., Gil, L., Vidal-Abarca, E., Martínez, T., Mañá, A., & Gilabert, R. (2011). Evaluación de la competencia lectora: la prueba de Competencia Lectora para Educación Secundaria (CompLEC). Psicothema, 23(4), 808-817.

Magliano, J. P., & Millis, K. K. (2003). Assessing reading skill with a think-aloud procedure and latent semantic analysis. Cognition and Instruction, 21(3), 251–283. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2103_02

Martínez, T., Vidal-Abarca, E., Gil, L., & Gilabert, R. (2009). On-line assessment of comprehension pro-cesses. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12, 308-319. doi:10.1017/S1138741600001700

Martínez, T., Vidal-Abarca, E., Sellés, P., & Gilabert, R. (2008). Evaluation of comprehension strategies and processes: Test of Comprehension Processes (TCP). Infancia y Aprendizaje, 31(3), 319-332.

McCrudden, M. T., & Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 113 –139. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9010-7

McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. P. (2009). Self-explanations and metacognition. In D. Hacker, J. Dun-losky and A. C. Graesser (Eds.). Handbook of metacognition (pp. 60-81). NY: Routledge.

McNamara, D. S., O’Reilly, T. P., Best, R. M., & Ozuru, Y. (2006). Improving adolescent students’ read-ing comprehension with iSTART. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(2), 147-171.

Naumann, J., & Goldhammer, F. (2017). Time-on-task effects in digital reading are non-linear and moderated by persons' skills and tasks' demands. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 1-16. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.002

Ness, M. (2011). Explicit reading comprehension instruction in elementary classrooms: Teacher use of reading comprehension strategies. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 25, 98–117. doi:10.1080/02568543.2010.531076

OECD (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: a framework for PISA 2006. París: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264026407-en

OECD (2010). PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science (Volume I). Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/9789264091450-en

OECD (2013). Education at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/eag-2013-en

Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading. The nature of constructively responsive reading. NL: LEA.

Rouet, J-F., Britt, M. A., & Durik, A. M. (2017). RESOLV: Readers' representation of reading contexts and tasks. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 200-215. doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1329015

Rupp, A. A., Ferne, T., & Choi, H. (2006). How assessing reading comprehension with multiple-choice questions shapes the construct: a cognitive processing perspective. Language Testing, 23(4), 441-474. doi:10.1191/0265532206lt337oa

Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and In-struction, 4(4), 295–312. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5

Vidal-Abarca, E., Gilabert, R., & Abad, N. (2002). Una propuesta para hacer buenos textos expositivos: hacia una tecnología del texto expositivo. Infancia y Aprendizaje: Journal for the Study of Educa-tion and Development, 25(4), 499-514. doi:10.1174/021037002762064064

Vidal-Abarca, E., Mañá, A., & Gil, L. (2010). Individual differences for self-regulating task-oriented reading activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 817-826. doi:10.1037/a0020062

Vidal-Abarca, E., Martínez, T., Gil, L., García, A., & Mañez, I. (2019). Learning tasks in electronic envi-ronments: Advances towards interactive etextbooks. In K. Millis, D. L. Long, J. P. Magliano, and K. Wiemer, (Eds.), Deep comprehension: Multidisciplinary approaches to understanding, enhanc-ing and measuring comprehension (pp. 99-113). NY: Routledge.

Vidal-Abarca, E., Martínez, T., Salmerón, L., Cerdán, R., Gilabert, R., Gil, L., Mañá, A., Llorens, A., & Ferris, R. (2011). Recording on-line processes in task-oriented reading with Read&Answer. Behav-ior Research Methods, 43(1), 179–192. doi:10.3758/s13428-010-0032-1

Vidal-Abarca, E., Reyes, H., Gilabert, R., Calpe, J., Soria, E., & Graesser, A. C. (2002). ETAT: Expository Text Analysis Tool. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34(1), 93-107. doi:10.3758/BF03195428

Wolfe, M. B., & Goldman, S. R. (2005). Relations between adolescents' text processing and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 467-502. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2304_2

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif