Brain, Behavior and Evolution

Liu M.a,c· Liu Y.a· Wang H.a· Jia J.a· Liu K.b

Author affiliations

aCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
bFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Fishery Resources and Eco-Environment, Fisheries College, Jimei University, Xiamen, China
cShenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.

Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.

Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud Rent for 48h to view Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud Printing and saving restrictions apply Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more

Subcription rates

Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Received: April 09, 2021
Accepted: February 06, 2022
Published online: February 21, 2022

Number of Print Pages: 10
Number of Figures: 4
Number of Tables: 4

ISSN: 0006-8977 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9743 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/BBE

Abstract

Recent studies on the differences in cognitive ability between individuals focused on two aspects: one is whether the individual differences in cognitive ability are related to brain size, the other is whether they pertain to certain personality traits. To explore these two hypotheses, we tested the personality traits, cognitive abilities, and brain volumes of western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). First, a color preference test was conducted to select two unbiased colors for G. affinis for subsequent cognitive tests. The results showed that G. affinis had a great preference for red and green to yellow and blue; therefore, the red-green combination was selected for the study of cognitive abilities. Then, we explored the relationship among cognition, personality, and brain morphology through cognitive abilities tests, personality traits, and brain volume measurements. We found that there was a trade-off among cognition, personality, and brain morphology. For example, more active individuals found food faster, but had also poor memory; Those individuals with larger corpus cerebelli were bolder while they were less likely to find food; The individuals that found food faster were more active and had a smaller inferior lobe. The color preference test provides a reliable way for selecting unbiased colors for behavioral studies in G. affinis. Meanwhile, our study indicates that there exists a balance mechanism among cognition, personality, and brain morphology.

© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel

References Aoki R, Tsuboi T, Okamoto H. Y-maze avoidance: an automated and rapid associative learning paradigm in zebrafish. Neurosci Res. 2014;91:69–72. Avdesh A, Martin-Iverson MT, Mondal A, Chen M, Askraba S, Morgan N, et al. Evaluation of color preference in zebrafish for learning and memory. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;28(2):459–69. Axelrod CJ, Laberge F, Robinson BW. Intraspecific brain size variation between coexisting sunfish ecotypes. Proc Biol Sci. 2018;285(1890):20181971. Baker MR, Wong RY. Contextual fear learning and memory differ between stress coping styles in zebrafish. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):9935. Barton RA, Harvey PH. Mosaic evolution of brain structure in mammals. Nature. 2000;405(6790):1055–8. Bensky MK, Paitz R, Pereira L, Bell AM. Testing the predictions of coping styles theory in threespined sticklebacks. Behav Processes. 2017;136:1–10. Benson-Amram S, Dantzer B, Stricker G, Swanson EM, Holekamp KE. Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivores. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:2532–7. Bierbach D, Sommer-Trembo C, Hanisch J, Wolf M, Plath M. Personality affects mate choice: bolder males show stronger audience effects under high competition. Behav Ecol. 2015;26:1314–25. Bloch S, Thomas M, Colin I, Galant S, Machado E, Affaticati P, et al. Mesencephalic origin of the inferior lobe in zebrafish. BMC Biol. 2019;17(1):22. Brown C, Braithwaite VA. Effects of predation pressure on the cognitive ability of the poeciliid Brachyraphis episcopi. Behav Ecol. 2004;16(2):482–87. Buechel SD, Boussard A, Kotrschal A, van der Bijl W, Kolm N. Brain size affects performance in a reversal-learning test. Proc Biol Sci. 2018;285:20172031. Butler AB, Hodos W. Comparative vertebrate neuroanatomy: evolution and adaptation. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Wiley; 2005. Chen BJ, Liu K, Zhou L, Gomes Silva G, Sommer-Trembo C, Plath M. Personality differentially affects individual mate choice decisions in female and male Western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). PLoS One. 2018;13:e0197197. Chen Y, Jim J, Xiao Q. Taxonomy and distribution of the genus Oryzias in Yunnan, China. Acta Zootax Sinica. 1989;14:239–46. Claudio C, Charles L. Interaction between animal personality and animal cognition. Curr Zool. 2011;57(4):491–98. Cote J, Clobert J, Brodin T, Fogarty S, Sih A. Personality-dependent dispersal: Characterization, ontogeny and consequences for spatially structured populations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010;365:4065–76. Daniel DK, Bhat A. Bolder and brighter? exploring correlations between personality and cognitive abilities among individuals within a population of wild zebrafish, danio rerio. Front Behav Neurosci. 2020;14:138. D’Aniello B, Di Cosmo A, Scandurra A, Pinelli C. Mosaic and concerted brain evolution: the contribution of microscopic comparative neuroanatomy in lower vertebrates. Front Neuroanat. 2019;13:86. DeCasien AR, Higham JP. Primate mosaic brain evolution reflects selection on sensory and cognitive specialization. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019;3(10):1483–93. DePasquale C, Wagner T, Archard GA, Ferguson B, Braithwaite VA. Learning rate and temperament in a high predation risk environment. Oecologia. 2014;176(3):661–7. Dougherty LR, Guillette LM. Linking personality and cognition: a meta-analysis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018;373(1756):20170282. Dudgeon D. Anthropogenic influences on Hong Kong streams. Geo J. 1996;40(1–2):53–61. Echevarria DJ, Caramillo EM, Gonzalez-Lima F. Methylene blue facilitates memory retention in zebrafish in a dose-dependent manner. Zebrafish. 2016;13(6):489–94. Etheredge RI, Avenas C, Armstrong MJ, Cummings ME. Sex-specific cognitive-behavioural profiles emerging from individual variation in numerosity discrimination in Gambusia affinis. Anim Cogn. 2018;21(1):37–53. Finlay BL, Darlington RB. Linked regularities in the development and evolution of mammalian brains. Science. 1995;268:1578–84. Fong S, Buechel SD, Boussard A, Kotrschal A, Kolm N. Plastic changes in brain morphology in relation to learning and environmental enrichment in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). J Exp Biol. 2019;222(Pt 10):jeb200402. Gao J, Ouyang X, Chen BJ, Jourdan J, Plath M. Molecular and morphometric evidence for the widespread introduction of Western mosquitofish Gambusia affinis (Baird and Girard, 1853) into freshwaters of mainland China. BioInvasions Rec. 2017;6:281–9. Giassi AC, Ellis W, Maler L. Organization of the gymnotiform fish pallium in relation to learning and memory: III. Intrinsic connections. J Comp Neurol. 2012;520(15):3369–94. Gonda A, Herczeg G, Merilä J. Evolutionary ecology of intraspecific brain size variation: a review. Ecol Evol. 2013;3(8):2751–64. Griffin AS, Guillette LM, Healy SD. Cognition and personality: an analysis of an emerging field. Trends Ecol Evol. 2015;30(4):207–14. Gu J, Li DY, Luo Y, Ying SB, Zhang LY, Shi QM, et al. Brain size in Hylarana guentheri seems unaffected by variation in temperature and growth season. Anim Biol. 2017;67(3–4):209–25. Guenther A, Brust V, Dersen M, Trillmich F. Learning and personality types are related in cavies (Cavia aperea). J Comp Psychol. 2014;128(1):74–81. Guozhu C. Food analysis of Hebius octolineatum and its predation on Oryzias sinensis. Sichuan J Zool. 2016;35(4):588–92. Herczeg G, Urszán TJ, Orf S, Nagy G, Kotrschal A, Kolm N. Brain size predicts behavioural plasticity in guppies (Poecilia reticulata): an experiment. J Evol Biol. 2019;32(2):218–26. Hoops D, Vidal-García M, Ullmann JFP, Janke AL, Stait-Gardner T, Duchêne DA, et al. Evidence for concerted and mosaic brain evolution in dragon lizards. Brain Behav Evol. 2017;90(3):211–23. Ibrahim AA, Huntingford FA. Laboratory and field studies on diet choice in three‐spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus L., in relation to profitability and visual features of prey. J Fish Biol. 1989;34(2):245–57. Jerison H. Evolution of the brain and intelligence. Curr Anthropol. 1975;16(3):403–26. Kaneko S, Masuda R, Yamashita Y. Memory retention capacity using two different training methods, appetitive and aversive learning, in juvenile red sea bream Chrysophrys major. J Fish Biol. 2019;94(2):231–40. Kim YH, Lee KS, Kim YS, Kim YH, Kim JH. Effects of hypoxic preconditioning on memory evaluated using the T-maze behavior test. Anim Cells Syst. 2019;23:10–17. Kim YH, Lee KS, Park A, Min T. Adding preferred color to a conventional reward method improves the memory of zebrafish in the T-maze behavior model. Anim Cells Sys. 2017;21:374–81. Kotrschal A, Lievens EJ, Dahlbom J, Bundsen A, Semenova S, Sundvik M, et al. Artificial selection on relative brain size reveals a positive genetic correlation between brain size and proactive personality in the guppy. Evolution. 2014;68(4):1139–49. Kotrschal A, Rogell B, Bundsen A, Svensson B, Zajitschek S, Brännström I, et al. Artificial selection on relative brain size in the guppy reveals costs and benefits of evolving a larger brain. Curr Biol. 2013;23(2):168–71. Kotrschal A, Taborsky B. Environmental change enhances cognitive abilities in fish. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(4):e1000351. Liu J, Yang C, Yu J, Wang H, Møller AP, Liang W. Egg recognition and brain size in a cuckoo host. Behav Processes. 2020;180:104223. Lucon-Xiccato T, Bisazza A. Individual differences in cognition among teleost fishes. Behav Processes. 2017;141(Pt 2):184–95. Luo Y, Zhong MJ, Huang Y, Li F, Liao WB, Kotrschal A. Seasonality and brain size are negatively associated in frogs: evidence for the expensive brain framework. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16629. Mathot KJ, Wright J, Kempenaers B, Dingemanse NJ. Adaptive strategies for managing uncertainty may explain personality-related differences in behavioural plasticity. Oikos. 2012;121(7):1009–20. Ng MC, Tang TH, Ko MC, Wu YJ, Hsu CP, Yang YL, et al. Stimulation of the lateral division of the dorsal telencephalon induces synaptic plasticity in the medial division of adult zebrafish. Neurosci Lett. 2012;512(2):109–13. Ngoc Hieu BT, Ngoc Anh NT, Audira G, Juniardi S, Liman RAD, Villaflores OB, et al. Development of a modified three-day t-maze protocol for evaluating learning and memory capacity of adult zebrafish. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(4):1464. Odling-Smee LC, Boughman JW, Braithwaite VA. Sympatric species of threespine stickleback differ in their performance in a spatial learning task. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2008;62(12):1935–45. Olson DJ, Kamil AC, Balda RP, Nims PJ. Performance of four seed-caching corvid species in operant tests of nonspatial and spatial memory. J Comp Psychol. 1995;109(2):173–81. Peeters BW, Moeskops M, Veenvliet AR. Color preference in danio rerio: effects of age and anxiolytic treatments. Zebrafish. 2016;13(4):330–4. Pilehvar A, Town RM, Blust R. The effect of copper on behaviour, memory, and associative learning ability of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020;188:109900. Piyapong C, Krause J, Chapman B, Ramnarine I, Louca V, Croft D. Sex matters: a social context to boldness in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol. 2010;21:3–8. Pollen A, Dobberfuhl A, Scace J, Igulu M, Renn S, Shumway C, et al. Environmental complexity and social organization sculpt the brain in lake tanganyikan cichlid fish. Brain Behav Evol. 2007;70:21–39. Réale D, Reader SM, Sol D, McDougall PT, Dingemanse NJ. Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007;82(2):291–318. Roberts MG, Savage GE. Effects of hypothalamic lesions on the food intake of the goldfish (Carassius auratus). Brain Behav Evol. 1978;15:150–64. Rodríguez F, Durán E, Gómez A, Ocaña FM, Alvarez E, Jiménez-Moya F, et al. Cognitive and emotional functions of the teleost fish cerebellum. Brain Res Bullet. 2005;66(4–6):365–70. Roy T, Suriyampola PS, Flores J, López M, Hickey C, Bhat A, et al. Color preferences affect learning in zebrafish, Danio rerio. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):14531. Safi K, Dechmann DK. Adaptation of brain regions to habitat complexity: a comparative analysis in bats (Chiroptera). Proc Biol Sci. 2005;272(1559):179–86. Saito K, Watanabe S. Deficits in acquisition of spatial learning after dorsomedial telencephalon lesions in goldfish. Behav Brain Res. 2006 Sep 25;172(2):187–94. Scharnweber K, Plath M, Tobler M. Examination of boldness traits in sexual and asexual mollies (Poecilia latipinna, P. formosa). Acta Ethol. 2011;14(2):77–83. Schulz‐Mirbach T, Eifert C, Riesch R, Farnworth MS, Zimmer C, Bierbach D, et al. Toxic hydrogen sulphide shapes brain anatomy: a comparative study of sulphide‐adapted ecotypes in the Poecilia mexicana complex. J Zool. 2016:300:163–76. Shettleworth SJ. Cognition, evolution, and behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. Silveira MM, Ferreira de Souza J, Pires Moreira AL, Silva PF, Luchiari AC. Memory retention of appetitive and aversive conditioning in the damselfish Stegastes fuscus. J Fish Biol. 2019;95(3):772–80. Sol D. Revisiting the cognitive buffer hypothesis for the evolution of large brains. Biol Lett. 2009;5(1):130–3. Sommer-Trembo C, Plath M. Consistent individual differences in associative learning speed are not linked to boldness in female Atlantic mollies. Anim Cogn. 2018;21(5):661–70. Spence R, Smith C. Innate and learned colour preference in the zebrafish, danio rerio. Ethology. 2008;114(6):582–8. Trompf L, Brown C. Personality affects learning and trade-offs between private and social information in guppies, Poecilia reticulata. Anim Behav. 2014;88:99–106. van der Bijl W, Thyselius M, Kotrschal A, Kolm N. Brain size affects the behavioural response to predators in female guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Proc Biol Sci. 2015;282(1812):20151132. Wallace KJ, Rausch RT, Ramsey ME, Cummings ME. Sex differences in cognitive performance and style across domains in mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). Anim Cogn. 2020;23(4):655–69. White S, Wagner T, Gowan C, Braithwaite V. Can personality predict individual differences in brook trout spatial learning ability? Behav Processes. 2016:141:220–8. Zhang F, Jiang H, Jin J, Qiu Y, Chen G. Characteristic re-description of ricefish Oryzias curvinotus from Guangdong, China. Sichuan J Zool. 2017;036(005):564–71. Zupanc GK. Neurogenesis and neuronal regeneration in the adult fish brain. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2006;192(6):649–70. Zupanc GK. Adult neurogenesis and neuronal regeneration in the brain of teleost fish. J Physiol Paris. 2008;102(4–6):357–73. Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Received: April 09, 2021
Accepted: February 06, 2022
Published online: February 21, 2022

Number of Print Pages: 10
Number of Figures: 4
Number of Tables: 4

ISSN: 0006-8977 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9743 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/BBE

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.