Small and Large Bowel: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Yang X. · Zhu C. · Li Y. · Li Y. · Zuo X.
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
Buy
FullText & PDF
Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more
CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *
Select
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Learn more
Rent/Cloud
Rent for 48h to view
Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Select
Subscribe
Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more
Subcription rates
Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.
Article / Publication Details
Abstract
Introduction: The long-term risks of post-polypectomy colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality among patients with low-risk adenomas (LRAs) are unclear. This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of CRC incidence and mortality following LRAs removal.
Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library for studies that reported the risk of metachronous CRC incidence and mortality after colonoscopy. The primary outcome was the risk of CRC incidence and mortality in patients with LRAs. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI.
Results: Thirteen observational studies with 1,750,305 patients (45.4% male; follow-up: 4.5-16.5 years) were included. A meta-analysis of seven studies showed a higher CRC incidence in patients with LRAs than those without adenomas [per 10,000 person-years: 5.2 vs 3.9; RR 1.25 (95% CI 1.05-1.49), I2=0%]. However, the CRC-related death was not significantly different between the two groups [RR 1.13 (95% CI 0.75-1.69), I2=0%]. When compared with the general population, the meta-analysis showed a significantly lower risk of CRC incidence in patients with LRAs [RR 0.59 (95%CI 0.45-0.77), I2=0%], and another three studies, which could not be pooled, showed a reduction in the risk of CRC-related death in the LRAs group.
Conclusions: Patients with LRAs have a small but higher risk of post-polypectomy CRC incidence than patients without adenomas. The marginally higher absolute incidence seemed insufficient for more intensive surveillance colonoscopy, but the significant difference suggested different follow-up strategies between patients with LRAs and those without adenomas.
S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
留言 (0)