A COMPARISON OF AKIN, KDIGO AND RIFLE DEFINITIONS TO DIAGNOSE ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY AND PREDICT THE OUTCOMES AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY IN A SOUTH ASIAN COHORT

Abstract

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) after cardiac surgery is associated with an increased mortality and morbidity. Different definitions for AKI have been used such as Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN), Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) or risk, injury, failure, loss, end-stage kidney disease (RIFLE). Each of these definitions have their own benefits and limitations for predicting the degree of AKI and adverse outcomes following cardiac surgery. This study was aimed to compare the three AKI definitions to diagnose AKI and their predictive ability for mortality and morbidity after isolated coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) in a South Asian cohort. Material and Methods: A single center retrospective review was conducted on 1508 patients having undergone isolated CABG surgery during January 2015 to January 2019. AKI was assessed on three definitions and comparative receiver operating characteristics curves were built against the outcomes to assess discriminative power of each. Results: Mean age of participants was 59.43 (±1.12) years, predominantly males (82.6%). Patient with AKI were elder, more likely to be diabetic and hypertensive. AKI by any definition occurred in 58.7% (885/1508) patients. Frequency of AKI was 508 (33.7%), 517 (34.4%) and 871 (57.8%) on AKIN, KDIGO and RIFLE criteria, respectively. The proportion of patients with RIFLE- risk 619 (41%) was greater compared with AKIN stage 1 [342 (22.7%)], and KDIGO stage 1 [330 (21.9%)], while for stage 2 and 3 the proportions were comparable across the three systems. Area under the curve (AUC) for 30-day mortality for AKIN was [0.786, (95% CI: 0.764 to 0.806)], KDIGO: [0.796, (95% CI: 0.775 to 0.816)], and for RIFLE [0.844, (95% CI: 0.825 to 0.862)]. AUC for overall morbidity were in undesirable ranges (i.e. >0.5 to ≤ 0.7) for all three definitions. Conclusion: In a South Asian cohort, performance of AKIN and KDIGO criteria was comparable to diagnose AKI, while RIFLE definition, though overestimated the incidence of AKI particularly stage 1, and had an excellent discriminatory power to predict mortality compared to other two definitions.

The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

Article / Publication Details

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif