Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref Bar, M. (2004). Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(8), 617–629. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1476
Google Scholar | Crossref Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Google Scholar | Crossref Biederman, I., Gerhardstein, P. C. (1995). Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(6), 1506–1514. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.6.1506
Google Scholar | Crossref Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R. J., Rabinowitz, J. C. (1982). Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 143–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90007-X
Google Scholar | Crossref Borges, M. T., Fernandes, E. G., Coco, M. I. (2020). Age-related differences during visual search: The role of contextual expectations and cognitive control mechanisms. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 27(4), 489–516.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Bouazzaoui, B., Isingrini, M., Fay, S., Angel, L., Vanneste, S., Clarys, D., Taconnat, L. (2010). Aging and self-reported internal and external memory strategy uses: The role of executive functioning. Acta Psychologica, 135(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.007
Google Scholar | Crossref Castelhano, M. S., Heaven, C. (2011). Scene context influences without scene gist: Eye movements guided by spatial associations in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(5), 890–896. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0107-8
Google Scholar | Crossref Craik, F. I. M. (1983). On the transfer of information from temporary to permanent memory [and discussion]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 302(1110), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1983.0059
Google Scholar | Crossref Craik, F. I. M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In Klix, F., Hagendorf, H. (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities (pp. 409–422). Elsevier.
Google Scholar Craik, F. I. M., Byrd, M. (1982). Aging and cognitive deficits: The role of attentional resources. In Craik, F. I. M., Trehub, S. (Eds.), Aging and cognitive processes (pp. 191–211). Plenum Press. https://doi.org/110.1007/978-1-4684-4178-9_11
Google Scholar Craik, F. I. M., Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
Google Scholar | Crossref Craik, F. I. M., McDowd, J. M. (1987). Age differences in recall and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(3), 474–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.474
Google Scholar | Crossref Deloche, G., Hannequin, D. T. (1997). Test de denomination orale d’images DO 80 [Picture Naming Test DO-80]. Les Editions Du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
Google Scholar Draschkow, D., Wolfe, J. M., Võ, L.-H. (2014). Seek and you shall remember: Scene semantics interact with visual search to build better memories. Journal of Vision, 14(8), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1167/14.8.10
Google Scholar | Crossref Dunlosky, J., Hertzog, C. (1998). Aging and deficits in associative memory: What is the role of strategy production? Psychology and Aging, 13(4), 597–607. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.13.4.597
Google Scholar | Crossref Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
Google Scholar | Crossref Foster, J. K., Behrmann, M., Stuss, D. T. (1995). Aging and visual search: Generalized cognitive slowing or selective deficit in attention? Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 2(4), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825589508256604
Google Scholar | Crossref Froger, C., Bouazzaoui, B., Isingrini, M., Taconnat, L. (2012). Study time allocation deficit of older adults: The role of environmental support at encoding? Psychology and Aging, 27(3), 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026358
Google Scholar | Crossref Grober, E., Buschke, H., Crystal, H., Bang, S., Dresner, R. (1988). Screening for dementia by memory testing. Neurology, 38, 900–903. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.38.6.900
Google Scholar | Crossref Henderson, J. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.006
Google Scholar | Crossref Henderson, J. M., Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K. (1987). Effects of foveal priming and extrafoveal preview on object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 13(3), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.13.3.449
Google Scholar | Crossref Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P. A. J., Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(1), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.1.210
Google Scholar | Crossref Hollingworth, A. (2012). Guidance of visual search by memory and knowledge. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 59, 63–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4794-8_4
Google Scholar | Crossref Hout, M. C., Goldinger, S. D. (2010). Learning in repeated visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(5), 1267–1282. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.5.1267
Google Scholar | Crossref Hout, M. C., Goldinger, S. D. (2012). Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(1), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023894
Google Scholar | Crossref Howard, C. J., Pharaon, R. G., Körner, C., Smith, A. D., Gilchrist, I. D. (2011). Visual search in the real world: Evidence for the formation of distractor representations. Perception, 40(10), 1143–1153. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7088
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Howard, J. H., Howard, D. V., Dennis, N. A., Yankovich, H., Vaidya, C. J. (2004). Implicit spatial contextual learning in healthy aging. Neuropsychology, 18(1), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.18.1.124
Google Scholar | Crossref Humphrey, D. G., Kramer, A. F. (1997). Age differences in visual search for feature, conjunction, and triple-conjunction targets. Psychology and Aging, 12(4), 704–717. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.12.4.704
Google Scholar | Crossref Hwang, A. D., Higgins, E. C., Pomplun, M. (2009). A model of top-down attentional control during visual search in complex scenes. Journal of Vision, 9(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.5.25.A
Google Scholar Josephs, E. L., Draschkow, D., Wolfe, J. M., Võ, M. L. H. (2016). Gist in time: Scene semantics and structure enhance recall of searched objects. Acta Psychologica, 169, 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.05.013
Google Scholar | Crossref Kalafat, M., Hugonot-Diener, L., Poitrenaud, J. (2003). Standardisation et étalonnage français du “Mini Mental State” (MMS) version GRÉCO. Revue de Neuropsychologie, 13, 209–236.
Google Scholar Kingstone, A., Smilek, D., Eastwood, J. D. (2008). Cognitive ethology: A new approach for studying human cognition. British Journal of Psychology, 99(3), 317–340. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712607X251243
Google Scholar | Crossref Kliegl, R., Wei, P., Dambacher, M., Yan, M., Zhou, X. (2011). Experimental effects and individual differences in linear mixed models: Estimating the relationship between spatial, object, and attraction effects in visual attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, Article 238.
Google Scholar | Medline Koehler, K., Eckstein, M. P. (2017). Beyond scene gist: Objects guide search more than scene background. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(6), 1177–1193. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000363
Google Scholar | Crossref Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
Google Scholar | Crossref Lindenberger, U., Mayr, U. (2014). Cognitive aging: Is there a dark side to environmental support? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.006
Google Scholar | Crossref Lüdecke, D. (2019). sjstats: Statistical functions for regression models (Version 0.17.6). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1284472
Google Scholar Mack, S. C., Eckstein, M. P. (2011). Object co-occurrence serves as a contextual cue to guide and facilitate visual search in a real viewing environment. Journal of Vision, 11(9), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1167/11.9.9
Google Scholar | Crossref Madden, D. J. (2007). Aging and visual attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(2), 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00478.x
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Madden, D. J., Parks, E. L., Tallman, C. W., Boylan, M. A., Hoagey, D. A., Cocjin, S. B., Johnson, M. A., Chou, Y., Potter, G. G., Chen, N., Packard, L. E., Siciliano, R. E., Monge, Z. A., Diaz, M. T. (2017). Frontoparietal activation during visual conjunction search: Effects of bottom-up guidance and adult age. Human Brain Mapping, 38(4), 2128–2149. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23509
Google Scholar | Crossref Madden, D. J., Pierce, T. W., Allen, P. A. (1996). Adult age differences in the use of distractor homogeneity during visual search. Psychology and Aging, 11(3), 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.11.3.454
Google Scholar | Crossref Neider, M. B., Kramer, A. F. (2011). Older adults capitalize on contextual information to guide search. Experimental Aging Research, 37(5), 539–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2011.619864
Google Scholar | Crossref Pertzov, Y., Avidan, G., Zohary, E. (2009). Accumulation of visual information across multiple fixations. Journal of Vision, 9(10), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.10.2
Google Scholar | Crossref Preuschhof, C., Sharifian, F., Rosenblum, L., Pohl, T. M., Pollmann, S. (2019). Contextual cueing in older adults: Slow initial learning but flexible use of distractor configurations. Visual Cognition, 27(5–8), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2019.1668516
Google Scholar | Crossref Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103(3), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.403
Google Scholar | Crossref Shaw, R. J., Craik, F. I. M. (1989). Age differences in predictions and performance on a cued recall task. Psychology and Aging, 4(2), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.4.2.131
Google Scholar | Crossref Shih, S. I., Meadmore, K. L., Liversedge, S. P. (2012). Aging, eye movements, and object-location memory. PLOS ONE, 7(3), Article e33485. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033485
Google Scholar | Crossref Smith, A. D., Park, D. C., Earles, J. L. K., Shaw, R. J., Whiting, W. L. (1998). Age differences in context integration in memory. Psychology and Aging, 13(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.13.1.21
Google Scholar | Crossref Smyth, A. C., Shanks, D. R. (2011). Aging and implicit learning: Explorations in contextual cuing. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022014
Google Scholar | Crossref Spotorno, S., Malcolm, G. L., Tatler, B. W. (2015). Disentangling the effects of spatial inconsistency of targets and distractors when searching in realistic scenes. Journal of Vision, 15(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1167/15.2.12
Google Scholar | Crossref Taconnat, L., Raz, N., Toczé, C., Bouazzaoui, B., Sauzéon, H., Fay, S., Isingrini, M. (2009). Ageing and organisation strategies in free recall: The role of cognitive flexibility. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(2–3), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440802296413
Google Scholar | Crossref Tatler, B. W., Gilchrist, I. D., Land, M. F. (2005). Visual memory for objects in natural scenes: From fixations to object files. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(5), 931–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000430
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Võ, M. L.-H., Henderson, J. M. (2009). Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception. Journal of Vision, 9(3), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.3.24
Google Scholar | Crossref Võ, L.-H., Wolfe, J. M. (2012). When does repeated search in scenes involve memory? Looking at versus looking for objects in scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024147
Google Scholar | Crossref Warren, D. E., Thurtell, M. J., Carroll, J. N., Wall, M. (2013). Perimetric evaluation of saccadic latency, saccadic accuracy, and visual threshold for peripheral visual stimuli in young compared with older adults. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, 54(8), 5778–5787. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-12032
Google Scholar | Crossref Whiting, W. L., Madden, D. J., Pierce, T. W., Allen, P. A. (2005). Searching from the top down: Ageing and attentional guidance during singleton detection. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A(1), 72–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000205
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Wickham, H. (2009). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer.