Creation of synthetic contrast-enhanced computed tomography images using deep neural networks to screen for renal cell carcinoma

Abstract

Objectives: To elucidate if synthetic contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images created from plain CT images using deep neural networks (DNN) could be used for screening, clinical diagnosis, and postoperative follow up of small diameter renal tumors by comparing the concordance rate between real and synthetic CECT images and the diagnoses according to 10 urologists. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study included 155 patients (artificial intelligence training cohort [n=99], validation cohort [n=56]) who underwent surgery for small-diameter (≤40 mm) renal tumors, with the pathological diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma, during 2010 to 2020. Preoperatively, dynamic plain CT and CECT images were obtained. We created a learned DNN using pix2pix. We examined the quality of the synthetic CECT images created using this DNN and compared them with real CECT images using the zero mean normalized cross correlation parameter. We assessed concordance rates between real and synthetic images and diagnoses according to 10 urologists by creating a receiver operating characteristic curve and calculating the area under the curve (AUC). Results: The synthetic CECT images were highly concordant with the real CECT images, regardless of the existence or morphology of the renal tumor. Regarding the concordance rate, a greater AUC was obtained with synthetic CECT (AUC=0.892) than with only CT (AUC=0.720; p<0.001). Conclusions: This study is the first to use DNN to create a high-quality synthetic CECT image that was highly concordant with a real CECT image. Synthetic CECT images could be used for urological diagnoses and clinical screening.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics committee/IRB of Nagoya University have ethical approval for this work

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif