Abstract

In agriculture, various chemicals are used to control the weeds. Out of which, glyphosate is an important herbicide invariably used in the cultivation of glyphosate-resistant crops to control weeds. Overuse of glyphosate results in the evolution of glyphosate-resistant weeds. Evolution of glyphosate resistance (GR) in Amaranthus palmeri (AP) is a serious concern in the USA. Investigation of the mechanism of GR in AP identified different resistance mechanisms of which 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) gene amplification is predominant. Molecular analysis of GR AP identified the presence of a 5- to >160-fold increase in copies of the EPSPS gene than in a glyphosate-susceptible (GS) population. This increased copy number of the EPSPS gene increased the genome size ranging from 3.5 to 11.8%, depending on the copy number compared to the genome size of GS AP. FISH analysis using a 399-kb EPSPS cassette derived from bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) as probes identified that amplified EPSPS copies in GR AP exist in extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA) in addition to the native copy in the chromosome. The EPSPS gene-containing eccDNA having a size of ∼400 kb is termed EPSPS-eccDNA and showed somatic mosacism in size and copy number. EPSPS-eccDNA has a genetic mechanism to tether randomly to mitotic or meiotic chromosomes during cell division or gamete formation and is inherited to daughter cells or progeny generating copy number variation. These eccDNAs are stable genetic elements that can replicate and exist independently. The genomic characterization of the EPSPS locus, along with the flanking regions, identified the presence of a complex array of repeats and mobile genetic elements. The cytogenomics approach in understanding the biology of EPSPS-eccDNA sheds light on various characteristics of EPSPS-eccDNA that favor GR in AP.

© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel

Introduction

Amaranthus palmeri (AP) is an annual herbaceous plant, which is a troublesome and economically damaging agronomic weed in the agricultural production system of the USA. Chemical control of AP offers a cost-effective control, however, overuse of and sole reliance on glyphosate for AP control has resulted in the evolution of glyphosate resistance (GR) in AP [Duke and Powles, 2008]. Modelling predicts that 5 applications of glyphosate each year with no other herbicides would result in resistance evolving in 74% of the simulated AP populations [Neve et al., 2011]. The primary mechanism of GR in AP is the amplification of the 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) gene [Gaines et al., 2010]. A similar GR mechanism was reported in Italian ryegrass [Salas et al., 2012], Kochia [Jugulam et al., 2014; Wiersma et al., 2015], waterhemp [Lorentz et al., 2014; Chatham et al., 2015], goose grass [Chen et al., 2015], ripgut brome [Malone et al., 2016], and windmill grass [Ngo et al., 2018]. FISH, a molecular cytogenetic method, was used to study the mechanism of EPSPS gene amplification in AP [Gaines et al., 2010], kochia [Jugulam et al., 2014], and waterhemp [Dillon et al., 2017]. With the advances in sequencing technologies and the availability of robust bioinformatics platforms, cytogenetic approaches combined with genomic approaches have given rise to cytogenomics, uniting ideas from classical, new cytogenetic, molecular-genetic/genomic and bioinformatic approaches under one roof [Liehr 2021]. Cytogenomics is a very powerful approach to address GR in AP [Gaines et al., 2010; Molin et al., 2017; Koo et al., 2018]. The first report that amplified copies of the EPSPS gene in GR in AP are present in the form of extrachromosomal circular DNA molecules (eccDNAs) conferring GR was given by Koo et al. [2018].

The concept that DNA might be organized as series of rings in the chromosomes of higher organisms was put forth by Franklin Stahl [Cairns, 1963] and experimentally proved by Hotta and Bassel [1965]. They referred to the circles of DNA of various sizes in mammalian cells as Double Minutes (DMs). In eukaryotes, eccDNA size ranges from <100 bases up to several hundred thousand base pairs. Based on the different sizes and sequences of eccDNA, Liao et al. [2020] categorized them into small polydispersed DNA (spcDNA; 100 bp–10 kb), telomeric circles (t-circles; multiples of 738 bp), microDNA (100–400 bp), and extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA; the largest one with millions of bp). Based on the cell type, tissue type, and genetic background, these DNA molecules show heterogeneity in size and copy number. eccDNAs can replicate and propagate in cells as stable genetic elements [Shoura et al., 2017; Turner et al., 2017]. eccDNA may originate from nuclear DNA by homologous recombination between adjacent repeats, such as amplified genes [Mukherjee and Storici, 2012] or tandem repeats (satellite, telomeric, centromeric, and ribosomal repeats) [Cohen et al., 2008; Diaz-Lara et al., 2016] or they can result from linear extrachromosomal forms of active transposable elements [Gaubatz 1990]. In plants, eccDNA derived from satellite repeats are common [Navratilova et al., 2008]. In eukaryotes, eccDNAs contain not only complete or partial genes but also intergenic sequences [Møller et al., 2018; Yerlici et al., 2019], playing a crucial role in genome evolution in response to selection pressure [Gresham et al., 2010]. eccDNAs can serve as templates for the reinsertion of amplified genes into chromosomes in yeast [Demeke et al., 2015]. In this review, a case study of eccDNA-mediated GR in AP is discussed.

Genomics of Glyphosate Resistance in A. palmeri

Ten years after the introduction of GR crops in the USA, the first case of GR in an AP population was reported in Georgia [Culpepper et al., 2006; Molin et al., 2017]. Various molecular mechanisms conferring GR in AP were reported [Gaines et al., 2011]. The GR AP population from Macon County, Georgia, was used to investigate the mechanism of resistance. The GR AP population contained 5- to >160-fold copies of the EPSPS gene than the glyphosate-susceptible (GS) population [Gaines et al., 2010]. Such a huge copy number increase contributed to the increase in genome size of GR AP [Molin et al., 2017]. A GS AP population from Iowa had a genome size of 0.82 pg/2C, whereas GR AP from Mississippi had various genome sizes depending on the number of copies of the EPSPS gene. Plants having 77, 79, 92, and 106 copies of the EPSPS gene had genome sizes of 0.88 pg/2C (6.8% genome increase), 0.85 pg/2C (3.5% genome increase), 0.87 pg/2C (5.75% genome increase), and 0.93 pg/2C (11.8% genome increase), respectively [Molin et al., 2017]. FISH analysis using the EPSPS gene as a probe revealed that amplified EPSPS gene copies were dispersed in every chromosome throughout the genome, suggesting that EPSPS gene amplification in GR AP was not caused by unequal crossing over or rolling circle replication-based mechanisms. Gaines et al. [2010] speculated that EPSPS amplification in GR AP could have originated via transposon-mediated elements that were activated during stress. He put forward the hypothesis that “the original EPSPS locus was associated with a mobile genetic element that activated and amplified the EPSPS gene”. Following this hypothesis, Gaines et al. [2013] constructed a fosmid library and generated a ∼30-kb sequence harboring 10 kb of the EPSPS gene flanked by a 1.5-kb upstream and 20-kb downstream region. Analysis of the genomic regions around the EPSPS gene revealed that it is bordered by miniature, inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) and a putative Activator (Ac) transposase [Gaines et al., 2013].

To explore more genomic regions around the EPSPS gene, Molin et al. [2017] constructed a BAC tiling path covering the EPSPS locus and flanking regions in GR AP, which was sequenced using the PacBio platform. The de novo assembly of the sequence produced a final sequence length of 297,445 bp. This EPSPS cassette contained a single copy of the EPSPS gene flanked by nearly equal-sized upstream and downstream regions. Around 300 repeat sequences were identified in the EPSPS cassette, predominately simple repeats, followed by Class I and II transposons. Helitrons, a novel class of repeats associated with genome reshuffling and gene amplification, were detected downstream of the EPSPS gene [Molin et al., 2017]. Based on the genomic characterization of the upstream and downstream regions of EPSPS in AP, the structural genomic region of the EPSPS locus is amplified and distributed among all chromosomes mediated by transposons in GR AP, which was further supported by FISH analysis [Gaines et al., 2010]. However, the notion that the EPSPS cassette is integrated randomly into chromosomes through the action of transposons became untenable when fiber-FISH conclusively demonstrated that it is a distinct entity organized as an extrachromosomal circular DNA that mediated the amplification of the EPSPS gene in GR AP [Koo et al., 2018].

EPSPS-eccDNA in Glyphosate Resistant A. palmeri

EccDNA containing the EPSPS gene in GR AP is termed EPSPS-eccDNA and is ca. 400 kb in size [Koo et al., 2018; Molin et al., 2020a]. Predominately, plant eccDNAs contain tandem repeats, which supports the concept of the origin of EPSPS-eccDNA by intrachromosomal homologous recombination. In natural selection, the mechanism for controlling the length of a nucleotide string is favored by the formation of tandem-repetitive structures rather than the sequence itself [Stephan and Cho, 1994]. Formation of eccDNA from tandem repeats was reported in Drosophila [Pont et al., 1987; Cohen et al., 2003], Xenopus [Cohen and Mechali, 2001], Arabidopsis [Navratilova et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2021], Oryza, Pisum, Secale, Triticum, and Vicia [Navratilova et al., 2008]. Hence, the predominance of complex arrays of repeats and transposon sequences [Molin et al., 2017] in EPSPS-eccDNA likely plays a role in controlling the size and dynamics of EPSPS-eccDNA in GR AP. Sequences containing 143 (AAAT)2 or 186 (AATT)2 motifs flank the EPSPS gene in EPSPS-eccDNA. In addition, EPSPS-eccDNA contains clustered long and short interspersed palindromic repeat sequences (CLiSPrs) flanking the EPSPS gene. These repeats may play a crucial role in the stability and dynamics of EPSPS-eccDNA [Molin et al., 2020a]. The EPSPS-eccDNA also have long terminal repeat (LTR) retroposons and non-LTR retroposons, which amplify by a copy and paste mechanism. Generally, LTRs carry a response element that directs the onset and termination of retrotransposon replication. Plant LTR promoters are activated by a variety of biotic and abiotic stresses [Ansari et al., 2007; Salazar et al., 2007]. In the life cycle of an LTR retroposon, the formation of eccDNA is a byproduct, which is an indicator for their continuing activity [Lanciano et al., 2017]. EccDNA is produced through heat-responsive, copia-like ONSEN retrotransposons in Arabidopsis and drug-induced activation of the Houba retrotransposons in Oryza sativa [Thieme et al., 2017]. The presence of repeats and transposons upstream and downstream of the EPSPS locus may facilitate the formation of EPSPS-eccDNA as a response to natural selection, conferring GR in AP.

Stability and Inheritance of EPSPS-eccDNAs

The first cytological evidence of EPSPS-eccDNA tethering to chromosomes mediating their inheritance to the daughter cells during cell division in plants was reported by Koo et al. [2018]. Typically, EPSPS-eccDNAs are randomly transmitted to daughter cells due to the lack of centromeres. The EPSPS-eccDNAs are transmitted to the next generation by tethering to meiotic chromosomes leading to a rapid spread and development of GR [Koo et al., 2018; Fig. 1]. The EPSPS-eccDNAs are not integrated back into the chromosome and exist as autonomous replicating structures that display unequal mitotic segregation and, thereby, produce soma cell heterogeneity for evolution of GR [Koo et al., 2018]. The sequencing and annotation of EPSPS-eccDNA revealed genetic elements that are responsible for EPSPS-eccDNA stability, replication, and tethering. Molin et al. [2020a] predicted that AP_R.00g000496 encodes a protein containing a helicase domain, which is involved in DNA replication and tethering of EPSPS-eccDNA to the nuclear chromatin. Molin et al. [2020b] described EPSPS-eccDNA as an autonomously replicating genetic element possessing autonomous replication sequences (ARS) and having homology with the ARS sequence found in yeast and other eukaryotes. The ARS sequence in AP contains 2 putative DNA unwinding elements rich in A + T content and displaying helical instability that can result in a unique DNA structure that can facilitate accessibility to the DNA replisome. The origin of replication (ori) on the eccDNA replicon occurs in a putative NAC-containing gene. The ARS sequence of the eccDNA replicon from AP enabled the autonomous replication in ARS-less yeast plasmid.

Fig. 1.

FISH mapping of EPSPS-eccDNA (red signals) on meiotic pachytene chromosomes of glyphosate-resistent A. palmeri with 80 EPSPS copies. a DAPI-stained pachytene chromosome showing EPSPS-eccDNAs lying outside the pachytene chromosomes. b FISH signals with the EPSPS-eccDNA probe. c Merged image.

Structural Conformation and Copy Number Variation

Fiber FISH analysis using 6 BACs representing the 399-kb EPSPS cassette [Koo et al., 2018] revealed the existence of structural polymorphisms in EPSPS-eccDNA. Predominately, EPSPS-eccDNA exist in circular (50.2%), followed by linear (21.8%), dimeric circular (11.8%), dimeric linear (8%), and atypical (8.2%) forms. The circularity of the EPSPS-eccDNA accounts for the stability and integrity of EPSPS-eccDNA, where the closed circular structure of eccDNA may impart resistance to exonuclease digestion. The purpose of structural polymorphism in EPSPS-eccDNA is not well understood. However, characterizing EPSPS-eccDNA structural polymorphisms may give clues regarding the pathway that gives rise to EPSPS-eccDNA. The copy number of EPSPS-eccDNA varies between the somatic cells, generating somatic mosaicism patterns. Using 2-color FISH with 5S rDNA and EPSPS-eccDNA as probes, 4 different patterns of EPSPS-eccDNA signals on 5S rDNA-labeled homologous chromosome pairs in different cells derived from a single root tip meristem were observed: (1) both chromosomes lack EPSPS-eccDNA signals (16.7%), (2) 1 of the 2 chromosomes lacks an EPSPS-eccDNA signal (25%), (3) both chromosomes have a similar signal intensity (33.3%), and (4) the 2 chromosomes vary in signal intensity (25%) [Koo et al., 2018]. We hypothesize that EPSPS-eccDNA is not associated with chromosomes during the interphase stage. EPSPS-eccDNAs in metaphase tend to randomly anchor to chromosomes and are associated with the chromosomes until the end of telophase, enabling their transmission to the daughter cells leading to somatic mosaicism (Fig. 2). EPSPS-eccDNAs also are inherited by tethering to meiotic chromosomes and confer copy number variation in somatic cells of the progeny. From metaphase cell spreads from a single root preparation of one plant, we observed that (1) EPSPS-eccDNAs were associated with most of the chromosomes similar to the GR AP, (2) EPSPS-eccDNAs were associated with half of the chromosomes, (3) EPSPS-eccDNAs were associated with only a few chromosomes, and (4) all chromosomes were free of EPSPS-eccDNAs. Similarly, a huge variation in EPSPS-eccDNA distribution in the cells was observed when analyzing the F1 progeny derived from the cross between GS AP and GR AP [see Fig. 5 shown in Koo et al., 2018]. This copy number variation is due to the independent existence of EPSPS-eccDNA and its unequal segregation during mitotic divisions.

Fig. 2.

Pictorial representation of EPSPS-eccDNA behaviours during mitotic cell division. EPSPS-eccDNAs in interphase are not associated with chromosome. EPSPS-eccDNA are associated with chromosome from metaphase to telophase, and EPSPS-eccDNA not associated with a chromosome will be lost during anaphase.

EPSPS-eccDNA Chromatin Landscape

Genes that occur in eccDNA amplify much faster than those in chromosomes. Turner et al. [2017] speculated that the genes carried by eccDNA can be easily accessed by the transcription machinery compared with chromosomal genes. Wu et al. [2019] further demonstrated that eccDNA was packaged into chromatin with an intact domain structure but lacked the higher-order compaction that is typical of chromosomes and displayed significantly enhanced chromatin accessibility enabling high transcription of genes. Similarly, preliminary investigation of eccDNA from AP observed that EPSPS-eccDNAs, highly condensed in mitotic and meiotic metaphase I chromosomes, are barely visible by DAPI staining [see Fig. 1 shown in Koo et al., 2018]. In meiotic pachytene stage, where chromosomes are decondensed and highly elongated, EPSPS-eccDNA appear as large dots [see Fig. 3 shown in Koo et al., 2018]. This correlation of chromosome condensation progression from meiotic pachytene through metaphase stages suggests that the EPSPS-eccDNA of AP may consist of basic nucleosome units organized into chromatin, rather than as naked DNA, and needs further investigation. Characterizing the histones present in EPSPS-eccDNAs will shed light on the structure and organization of EPSPS-eccDNA.

Conclusion

The introduction of GR crops favored the agriculture production system for a short period. Extensive use of glyphosate for the control of weeds gave rise to GR weeds. Different mechanisms operate that confer GR in plants. A case study with GR AP demonstrated how cytogenomics can unravel the mystery of evolution of GR. Genomic characterization of a 399-kb EPSPS cassette derived from BACs identified the complex array of repeats and the transposons flanking the EPSPS locus. Cytological investigation with BACs representing the EPSPS cassette identified that the EPSPS in GR AP exist as eccDNA, in addition to the EPSPS gene at the native locus of the chromosome. eccDNA containing the EPSPS gene in AP is termed EPSPS-eccDNA and exists as an autonomously replicating genetic element able to transmit during cell division by tethering to the mitotic chromosome. EPSPS-eccDNA is inherited to the progeny by tethering to meiotic chromosomes during gamete formation. This EPSPS-eccDNA is highly heterogeneous, exhibiting both copy number variation and somatic mosaicism. This copy number variation is attributed to unequal EPSPS-eccDNA segregation during mitotic divisions. The role of EPSPS-eccDNA in conferring genome plasticity to glyphosate challenge is discussed.

Acknowledgement

We thank W. John Raupp for critical review of the manuscript and Duane Wilson for technical assistance.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors report no competing interests.

Funding Sources

This research was supported by grants from the Kansas Wheat Commission and the Kansas Crop Improvement Association, Wheat Genetics Resource Center Industry/University Cooperative Research Center National Science Foundation Contract 1338897. This is contribution number 22-050-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-5502, USA.

Author Contributions

D.-H.K., R.S., B.F., and B.S.G. wrote the manuscript and analyzed the data and helped to draft the final manuscript.

References Ansari KI, Walter S, Brennan JM, Lemmens M, Kessans S, McGahern A, et al. Retrotransposon and gene activation in wheat in response to mycotoxigenic and non-mycotoxigenic-associated Fusarium stress. Theor Appl Genet. 2007;114:927–37. Cairns J. The bacterial chromosome and its manner of replication as seen by autoradiography. J Mol Biol. 1963;6:208–13. Chatham LA, Wu C, Riggins CW, Hager AG, Young BG, Roskamp GK, et al. EPSPS gene amplification is present in the majority of glyphosate-resistant Illinois waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) populations. Weed Technol. 2015;29(1):48–55. Chen J, Huang H, Zhang C, Wei S, Huang Z, Chen J, et al. Mutations and amplification of EPSPS gene confer resistance to glyphosate in goosegrass (Eleusine indica). Planta. 2015;242:859–68. Cohen S, Houben A, Segal D. Extrachromosomal circular DNA derived from tandemly repeated genomic sequences in plants. Plant J. 2008;53:1027–34. Cohen S, Mechali M. A novel cell-free system reveals a mechanism of circular DNA formation from tandem repeats. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:2542–8. Cohen S, Yacobi K, Segal D. Extrachromosomal circular DNA of tandemly repeated genomic sequences in Drosophila. Genome Res. 2003;13:1133–45. Culpepper AS, Grey TL, Vencill WK, Kichler JM, Webster TM, Brown SM, et al. Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci. 2006;54(4):620–6. Demeke MM, Foulquié-Moreno MR, Dumortier F, Thevelein JM. Rapid evolution of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae for xylose fermentation through formation of extra-chromosomal circular DNA. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005010. Diaz-Lara A, Gent DH, Martin RR. Identification of extrachromosomal circular DNA in hop via rolling circle amplification. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2016;148:237–40. Dillon A, Varanasi VK, Danilova TV, Koo DH, Nakka S, Peterson DE, et al. Physical mapping of amplified copies of the 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase gene in glyphosate-resistant Amaranthus tuberculatus. Plant Physiol. 2017;173:1226–34. Duke SO, Powles SB. Glyphosate: a once-in-a-century herbicide. Pest Manag Sci. 2008;64:319–25. Gaines TA, Shaner DL, Ward SM, Leach JE, Preston C, Westra P. Mechanism of resistance of evolved glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59:5886–9. Gaines TA, Wright AA, Molin WT, Lorentz L, Riggins CW, Tranel PJ, et al. Identification of genetic elements associated with EPSPS gene amplification. PLoS One. 2013;8:e65819. Gaines TA, Zhang W, Wang D, Bukun B, Chisholm ST, Shaner DL, et al. Gene amplification confers glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:1029–34. Gaubatz JW. Extrachromosomal circular DNAs and genomic sequence plasticity in eukaryotic cells. Mutat Res. 1990;237:271–92. Gresham D, Usaite R, Germann SM, Lisby M, Botstein D, Regenberg B. Adaptation to diverse nitrogen-limited environments by deletion or extrachromosomal element formation of the GAP1 locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:18551–6. Hotta Y, Bassel A. Molecular size and circularity of DNA in cells of mammals and higher plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965;53(2):356–62. Jugulam M, Niehues K, Godar AS, Koo DH, Danilova T, Friebe B, et al. Tandem Amplification of a Chromosomal Segment Harboring 5-Enolpyruvylshikimate-3-Phosphate Synthase Locus Confers Glyphosate Resistance in Kochia scoparia. Plant Physiol. 2014;166:1200–7. Koo DH, Molin WT, Saski CA, Jiang J, Putta K, Jugulam M, et al. Extrachromosomal circular DNA-based amplification and transmission of herbicide resistance in crop weed Amaranthus palmeri. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:3332–7. Lanciano S, Carpentier MC, Llauro C, Jobet E, Robakowska-Hyzorek D, Lasserre E, et al. Sequencing the extrachromosomal circular mobilome reveals retrotransposon activity in plants. PLoS Genet. 2017;13:e1006630. Liao Z, Jiang W, Ye L, Li T, Yu X, Liu L. Classification of extrachromosomal circular DNA with a focus on the role of extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) in tumor heterogeneity and progression. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2020;1874(1):188392. Liehr T. A definition for cytogenomics - Which also may be called chromosomics. In: Liehr T, editor. Cytogenomics. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2021. p. 1–7. Lorentz L, Gaines TA, Nissen SJ, Westra P, Strek HJ, Dehne HW, et al. Characterization of glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus tuberculatus populations. J Agric Food Chem. 2014;62:8134–42. Malone JM, Morran S, Shirley N, Boutsalis P, Preston C. EPSPS gene amplification in glyphosate-resistant Bromus diandrus. Pest Manag Sci. 2016;72:81–8. McClintock B. Mechanisms that rapidly reorganize the genome. Stadler Genetics Symposia University of Missouri; 1978. p. 25–48. Molin WT, Wright AA, Lawton-Rauh A, Saski CA. The unique genomic landscape surrounding the EPSPS gene in glyphosate resistant Amaranthus palmeri: a repetitive path to resistance. BMC Genomics. 2017;18:91. Molin WT, Yaguchi A, Blenner M, Saski CA. The EccDNA Replicon: A heritable, extranuclear vehicle that enables gene amplification and glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri. Plant Cell. 2020a;32:2132–40. Molin WT, Yaguchi A, Blenner M, Saski CA. Autonomous replication sequences from the Amaranthus palmeri eccDNA replicon enable replication in yeast. BMC Res Notes. 2020b;13:330–6. Møller HD, Mohiyuddin M, Prada-Luengo I, Sailani MR, Halling JF, Plomgaard P, et al. Circular DNA elements of chromosomal origin are common in healthy human somatic tissue. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1069–12. Mukherjee K, Storici F. A mechanism of gene amplification driven by small DNA fragments. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1003119. Navratilova A, Koblizkova A, Macas J. Survey of extrachromosomal circular DNA derived from plant satellite repeats. BMC Plant Biol. 2008;8:90. Neve P, Norsworthy JK, Smith KL, Zelaya IA. Modelling evolution and management of glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri. Weed Research. 2011;51(2):99–112. Ngo TD, Malone JM, Boutsalis P, Gill G, Preston C. EPSPS gene amplification conferring resistance to glyphosate in windmill grass (Chloris truncata) in Australia. Pest Manag Sci. 2018;74:1101–8. Pont G, Degroote F, Picard G. Some extrachromosomal circular DNAs from Drosophila embryos are homologous to tandemly repeated genes. J Mol Biol. 1987;195:447–51. Salas RA, Dayan FE, Pan Z, Watson SB, Dickson JW, Scott RC, et al. EPSPS gene amplification in glyphosate-resistant Italian ryegrass (Lolium perenne ssp. multiflorum) from Arkansas. Pest Manag Sci. 2012;68:1223–30. Salazar M, González E, Casaretto JA, Casacuberta JM, Ruiz-Lara S. The promoter of the TLC1.1 retrotransposon from Solanum chilense is activated by multiple stress-related signaling molecules. Plant Cell Rep. 2007;26:1861–8. Shoura MJ, Gabdank I, Hansen L, Merker J, Gotlib J, Levene SD. Fire AZ: Intricate and cell type-specific populations of endogenous circular DNA (eccDNA) in Caenorhabditis elegans and Homo sapiens. G3 (Bethesda). 2017;7:3295–303. Stephan W, Cho S. Possible role of natural selection in the formation of tandem-repetitive noncoding DNA. Genetics. 1994;136:333–41. Thieme M, Lanciano S, Balzergue S, Daccord N, Mirouze M, Bucher E. Inhibition of RNA polymerase II allows controlled mobilisation of retrotransposons for plant breeding. Genome Biol. 2017;18:134–10. Turner KM, Deshpande V, Beyter D, Koga T, Rusert J, Lee C, et al. Extrachromosomal oncogene amplification drives tumour evolution and genetic heterogeneity. Nature. 2017;543:122–5. Wang K, Tian H, Wang L, Wang L, Tan Y, Zhang Z, et al. Deciphering extrachromosomal circular DNA in Arabidopsis. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021;19:1176–83. Wiersma AT, Gaines TA, Preston C, Hamilton JP, Giacomini D, Buell CR, et al. Gene amplification of 5-enol-pyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase in glyphosate-resistant Kochia scoparia. Planta. 2015;241:463–74. Wu S, Turner KM, Nguyen N, Raviram R, Erb M, Santini J, et al. Circular ecDNA promotes accessible chromatin and high oncogene expression. Nature. 2019;575:699–703. Yerlici VT, Lu MW, Hoge CR, Miller RV, Neme R, Khurana JS, et al. Programmed genome rearrangements in Oxytricha produce transcriptionally active extrachromosomal circular DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:9741–60. Author Contacts

Dal-Hoe Koo, dkoo@ksu.edu

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Received: August 23, 2021
Accepted: December 07, 2021
Published online: January 12, 2022

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 1424-8581 (Print)
eISSN: 1424-859X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CGR

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.