1. Murray, DM, Taljaard, M, Turner, EL et al. Essential ingredients and innovations in the design and analysis of group-randomized trials. Annu Rev Public Health 2020; 41: 1–19.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Murray, DM. Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998, p. 467.
Google Scholar3. Donner, A, Klar, N. Design and analysis of cluster randomization trials in health research. London: Arnold, 2000, p. 178.
Google Scholar4. Hayes, RJ, Moulton, LH. Cluster randomised trials. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2009.
Google Scholar | Crossref5. Eldridge, S, Kerry, S. A practical guide to cluster randomised trials in health services research. London: Arnold, 2012.
Google Scholar | Crossref6. Campbell, MJ, Walters, SJ. How to design, analyse and report cluster randomised trials in medicine and health related research. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
Google Scholar | Crossref7. Hayes, RJ, Moulton, LH. Cluster randomised trials. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2017.
Google Scholar8. Kish, L. Survey sampling. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1965, p. 643.
Google Scholar9. Murray, DM, Pals, SL, George, SM et al. Design and analysis of group-randomized trials in cancer: a review of current practices. Prev Med 2018; 111: 241–247.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Brown, AW, Li, P, Bohan Brown, MM et al. Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: designing, analyzing, and reporting cluster randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 2015; 102(2): 241–248.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Crespi, CM, Maxwell, AE, Wu, S. Cluster randomized trials of cancer screening interventions: are appropriate statistical methods being used. Contemp Clin Trials 2011; 32(4): 477–484.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Diaz-Ordaz, K, Froud, R, Sheehan, B et al. A systematic review of cluster randomised trials in residential facilities for older people suggests how to improve quality. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013; 13: 127.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI13. Donner, A, Brown, KS, Brasher, P. A methodological review of non-therapeutic intervention trials employing cluster randomization, 1979–1989. Int J Epidemiol 1990; 19(4): 795–800.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Eldridge, S, Ashby, D, Bennett, C et al. Internal and external validity of cluster randomised trials: systematic review of recent trials. BMJ 2008; 336: 876–880.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Ivers, NM, Taljaard, M, Dixon, S et al. Impact of CONSORT extension for cluster randomised trials on quality of reporting and study methodology: review of random sample of 300 trials 2000–8. BMJ 2011; 343: d5886.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Murray, DM, Pals, SL, Blitstein, JL et al. Design and analysis of group-randomized trials in cancer: a review of current practices. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008; 100: 483–491.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Rutterford, C, Taljaard, M, Dixon, S et al. Reporting and methodological quality of sample size calculations in cluster randomized trials could be improved: a review. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68(6): 716–723.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Simpson, JM, Klar, N, Donnor, A. Accounting for cluster randomization: a review of primary prevention trials, 1990 through 1993. Am J Public Health 1995; 85(10): 1378–1383.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Varnell, SP, Murray, DM, Janega, JB et al. Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent practices. Am J Public Health 2004; 94(3): 393–399.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI20. Cook, DJ, Rutherford, WB, Scales, DC et al. Rationale, methodological quality, and reporting of cluster-randomized controlled trials in critical care medicine: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2021; 49: 977–987.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Puffer, S, Torgerson, D, Watson, J. Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journals. BMJ 2003; 327: 785–789.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Eldridge, SM, Ashby, D, Feder, GS et al. Lessons for cluster randomized trials in the twenty-first century: a systematic review of trials in primary care. Clin Trials 2004; 1(1): 80–90.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals23. Bowater, RJ, Abdelmalik, SM, Lilford, RJ. The methodological quality of cluster randomised controlled trials for managing tropical parasitic disease: a review of trials published from 1998 to 2007. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2009; 103(5): 429–436.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Froud, R, Eldridge, S, Diaz Ordaz, K et al. Quality of cluster randomized controlled trials in oral health: a systematic review of reports published between 2005 and 2009. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2012; 40Suppl1: 3–14.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Ivers, NM, Halperin, IJ, Barnsley, J et al. Allocation techniques for balance at baseline in cluster randomized trials: a methodological review. Trials 2012; 13: 120.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI26. Diaz-Ordaz, K, Kenward, MG, Cohen, A et al. Are missing data adequately handled in cluster randomised trials? A systematic review and guidelines. Clin Trials 2014; 11(5): 590–600.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI27. Mdege, ND, Brabyn, S, Hewitt, C et al. The 2 x 2 cluster randomized controlled factorial trial design is mainly used for efficiency and to explore intervention interactions: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67: 1083–1092.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline28. Wright, N, Ivers, N, Eldridge, S et al. A review of the use of covariates in cluster randomized trials uncovers marked discrepancies between guidance and practice. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68(6): 603–609.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline29. Fiero, MH, Huang, S, Oren, E et al. Statistical analysis and handling of missing data in cluster randomized trials: a systematic review. Trials 2016; 17: 72.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline30. Richardson, M, Garner, P, Donegan, S. Cluster randomised trials in cochrane reviews: evaluation of methodological and reporting practice. PLoS ONE 2016; 11(3): e0151818.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline31. Huang, S, Fiero, MH, Bell, ML. Generalized estimating equations in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: review of practice and simulation study. Clin Trials 2016; 13(4): 445–449.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI32. Agbla, SC, DiazOrdaz, K. Reporting non-adherence in cluster randomised trials: a systematic review. Clin Trials 2018; 15(3): 294–304.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI33. Heo, M, Nair, SR, Wylie-Rosett, J et al. Trial characteristics and appropriateness of statistical methods applied for design and analysis of randomized school-based studies addressing weight-related issues: a literature review. J Obes 2018; 2018: 8767315.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline34. Pals, SL, Murray, DM, Alfano, CM et al. Individually randomized group treatment trials: a critical appraisal of frequently used design and analytic approaches. Am J Public Health 2008; 98(8): 1418–1424.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline35. El Alili, M, van Dongen, JM, Goldfeld, KS et al. Taking the analysis of trial-based economic evaluations to the next level: the importance of accounting for clustering. Pharmacoeconomics 2020; 38(11): 1247–1261.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline36. Golzarri-Arroyo, L, Oakes, JM, Brown, AW et al. Incorrect analyses of cluster-randomized trials that do not take clustering and nesting into account likely lead to p-values that are too small. Child Obes 2020; 16: 65–66.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline37. O’Hara, LM, Blanco, N, Leekha, S et al. Design, implementation, and analysis considerations for cluster-randomized trials in infection control and hospital epidemiology: a systematic review. Infect Contr Hosp Epidemiol 2019; 40(6): 686–692.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline38. Hemming, K, Taljaard, M, Grimshaw, J. Introducing the new CONSORT extension for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials. Trials 2019; 20: 68.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline39. Thompson, JA, Fielding, KL, Davey, C et al. Bias and inference from misspecified mixed-effect models in stepped wedge trial analysis. Stat Med 2017; 36: 3670–3682.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline40. Hemming, K, Taljaard, M. Reflection on modern methods: when is a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial a good study design choice? Int J Epidemiol 2020; 49: 1043–1052.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline41. Hussey, MA, Hughes, JP. Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials 2007; 28: 182–191.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI42. Hemming, K, Haines, TP, Chilton, PJ et al. The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting. BMJ 2015; 350: h391.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline43. Hughes, JP, Granston, TS, Heagerty, PJ. Current issues in the design and analysis of stepped wedge trials. Contemp Clin Trials 2015; 45(Pt. A): 55–60.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline44. Kasza, J, Hemming, K, Hooper, R et al. Impact of non-uniform correlation structure on sample size and power in multiple-period cluster randomised trials. Stat Methods Med Res 2019; 28(3): 703–716.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI45. Li, F. Design and analysis considerations for cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a decay correlation structure. Stat Med 2020; 39: 438–455.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline46. Kasza, J, Forbes, AB. Inference for the treatment effect in multiple-period cluster randomised trials when random effect correlation structure is misspecified. Stat Methods Med Res 2019; 28(10–11): 3112–3122.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI47. Copas, AJ, Lewis, JJ, Thompson, JA et al. Designing a stepped wedge trial: three main designs, carry-over effects and randomisation approaches. Trials 2015; 16: 352.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI48. Brown, CA, Lilford, RJ. The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006; 6: 54.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline49. Mdege, ND, Man, MS, Taylor Nee Brown, CA et al. Systematic review of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials shows that design is particularly used to evaluate interventions during routine implementation. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64(9): 936–948.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI50. Beard, E, Lewis, JJ, Copas, A et al. Stepped wedge randomised controlled trials: systematic review of studies published between 2010 and 2014. Trials 2015; 16: 353.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI51. Davey, C, Hargreaves, J, Thompson, JA et al. Analysis and reporting of stepped wedge randomised controlled trials: synthesis and critical appraisal of published studies, 2010 to 2014. Trials 2015; 16: 358.
Google Scholar |