1. Murray, DM . Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Google Scholar2. Torgerson, DJ . Contamination in trials: is cluster randomisation the answer? BMJ 2001; 322(7282): 355–357.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Turner, EL, Li, F, Gallis, JA, et al. Review of recent methodological developments in group—randomized trials: part 1—design. Am J Public Health 2017; 107(6): 907–915.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Rosenbaum, PR . The consequences of adjustment for a concomitant variable that has been affected by the treatment. J R Stat Soc Ser A: G 1984; 147(5): 656–666.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI5. Eldridge, S, Kerry, S, Torgerson, DJ. Bias in identifying and recruiting participants in cluster randomised trials: what can be done? BMJ 2009; 339: b4006.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Brierley, G, Brabyn, S, Torgerson, D, et al. Bias in recruitment to cluster randomized trials: a review of recent publications. J Eval Clin Pract 2012; 18(4): 878–886.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Puffer, S, Torgerson, D, Watson, J. Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journals. BMJ 2003; 327(7418): 785–789.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Bolzern, J, Mnyama, N, Bosanquet, K, et al. A review of cluster randomized trials found statistical evidence of selection bias. J Clin Epidemiol 2018; 99: 106–112.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Wang, TY, Kaltenbach, LA, Cannon, CP, et al. Effect of medication co-payment vouchers on P2Y12 inhibitor use and major adverse cardiovascular events among patients with myocardial infarction: the ARTEMIS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2019; 321(1): 44–55.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Hernán, MA, Robins, JM. Causal inference: what If. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2020.
Google Scholar11. Hahn, S, Puffer, S, Torgerson, DJ, et al. Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005; 5: 10.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Caille, A, Kerry, S, Tavernier, E, et al. Timeline cluster: a graphical tool to identify risk of bias in cluster randomised trials. BMJ 2016; 354: i4291.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Leyrat, C, Caille, A, Donner, A, et al. Propensity scores used for analysis of cluster randomized trials with selection bias: a simulation study. Stat Med 2013; 32(19): 3357–3372.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Leyrat, C, Caille, A, Donner, A, et al. Propensity score methods for estimating relative risks in cluster randomized trials with low-incidence binary outcomes and selection bias. Stat Med 2014; 33(20): 3556–3575.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Frangakis, CE, Rubin, DB. Principal stratification in causal inference. Biometrics 2002; 58(1): 21–29.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI16. Su, F, Ding, P. Model-assisted analyses of cluster-randomized experiments. J R Stat Soc B, 2021.
Google Scholar17. Angrist, JD, Imbens, GW, Rubin, DB. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J Am Stat Assoc 1996; 91(434): 444–455.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI18. Roberts, C, Torgerson, DJ. Baseline imbalance in randomised controlled trials. BMJ 1999; 319(7203): 185.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Zeng, S, Li, F, Wang, R, et al. Propensity score weighting for covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials. Stat Med 2021; 40(4): 842–858.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Murray, DM, Blistein, JL. Methods to reduce the impact of intraclass correlation in group-randomized trials. Eval Rev 2003; 27(1): 79–103.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI21. Murray, DM, Varnell, SP, Blitstein, JL. Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments. Am J Public Health 2004; 94(3): 423–432.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI22. Rubin, DB . Inference and missing data. Biometrika 1976; 63(3): 581–592.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI23. Imbens, GW, Rubin, DB. Bayesian inference for causal effects in randomized experiments with noncompliance. Ann Stat 1997; 25: 305–327.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI24. Frangakis, CE, Rubin, DB, Zhou, X-H. Clustered encouragement designs with individual noncompliance: Bayesian inference with randomization, and application to advance directive forms. Biostatistics 2002; 3(2): 147–164.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Zhang, JL, Rubin, DB, Mealli, F. Likelihood-based analysis of causal effects of job-training programs using principal stratification. J Am Stat Assoc 2009; 104(485): 166–176.
Google Scholar | Crossref26. Schwartz, SL, Li, F, Mealli, F. A Bayesian semiparametric approach to intermediate variables in causal inference. J Am Stat Assoc 2011; 106(496): 1331–1344.
Google Scholar | Crossref27. Mattei, A, Li, F, Mealli, F. Exploiting multiple outcomes in Bayesian principal stratification analysis with application to the evaluation of a job training program. Ann Appl Stat 2013; 7(4): 2336–2360.
Google Scholar | Crossref28. Hudgens, MG, Halloran, ME. Toward causal inference with interference. J Am Stat Assoc 2008; 103(482): 832–842.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline29. Imai, K, Jiang, Z, Malani, A. Causal inference with interference and noncompliance in two-stage randomized experiments. J Am Stat Assoc 2021; 116: 632–644.
Google Scholar | Crossref30. Taljaard, M, Weijer, C, Grimshaw, JM, et al. The Ottawa Statement on the ethical design and conduct of cluster randomised trials: precis for researchers and research ethics committees. BMJ 2013; 346: f2838.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline31. Giraudeau, B, Ravaud, P. Preventing bias in cluster randomised trials. PLoS Med 2009; 6(5): e1000065.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline