Trends in Academic Achievement Within Otolaryngology: Does Fellowship Training Impact Research Productivity?

1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Health Research and the Privacy of Health Information: The HIPAA Privacy Rule ; Nass, SJ, Levit, LA, Gostin, LO, eds. Beyond the HIPAA Privacy Rule: Enhancing Privacy, Improving Health Through Research. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2009. 3, The Value, Importance, and Oversight of Health Research.
Google Scholar2. Mansi, A, Karam, WN, Chaaban, MR. Attitudes of residents and program directors towards research in otolaryngology residency. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2018;128(1):28–35.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals3. Bowe, SN, Laury, AM, Gray, ST. Associations between otolaryngology applicant characteristics and future performance in residency or practice: A systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;156(6):1011–1017.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals4. Hauser, LJ, Gebhard, GM, Blumhagen, R, Carlson, NE, Cabrera-Muffly, C. Applicant characteristics associated with successful matching into otolaryngology. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(5):1052–1057.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Mehta, K, Sinno, S, Thanik, V, Weichman, K, Janis, JE, Patel, A. Matching into integrated plastic surgery: The Value of Research Fellowships. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(2):640–645.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Baweja, R, Kraeutler, MJ, Mulcahey, MK, McCarty, EC. Determining the most important factors involved in ranking orthopaedic sports medicine fellowship applicants. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(11):2325967117736726.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals7. Iqbal, IJ, Sareen, P, Shoup, B, Muffly, T. Attributes of successfully matched versus unmatched obstetrics and gynecology fellowship applicants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(6):567.e1–567.e8.
Google Scholar | Crossref8. Hirsch, JE . An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(46):16569–16572.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Svider, PF, Choudhry, ZA, Choudhry, OJ, Baredes, S, Liu, JK, Eloy, JA. The use of the h-index in academic otolaryngology. Laryngoscope. 2012;123(1):103–106.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Akl, EA, Meerpohl, JJ, Raad, D, et al. Effects of assessing the productivity of faculty in academic medical centres: a systematic review. CMAJ. 2012;184(11):E602–E612.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Hirsch, JE . Does the H index have predictive power? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(49):19193–19198.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Castillo, M . Measuring academic output: The h-index. Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(5):783–784.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Patro, BK, Aggarwal, AK. How honest is the h-index in measuring individual research output? J Postgrad Med. 2011;57(3):264–265.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Huang, G, Fang, CH, Lopez, SA, Bhagat, N, Langer, PD, Eloy, JA. Impact of fellowship training on research productivity in academic ophthalmology. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(3):410–417.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Eloy, JD, Amin, MD, Pashkova, AA, Svider, PF, Mauro, KM, Eloy, JA. Fellowships represent a logical target for cultivating research in academic anesthesiology. J Educ Perioper Med. 2017;19(3):E607.
Google Scholar | Medline16. Eloy, JA, Svider, PF, Mauro, KM, Setzen, M, Baredes, S. Impact of fellowship training on research productivity in academic otolaryngology. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(12):2690–2694.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Bobian, MR, Shah, N, Svider, PF, et al. Does formal research training lead to academic success in otolaryngology? Laryngoscope. 2017;127(1):E15–E21.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Svider, PF, Blake, DM, Setzen, M, Folbe, AJ, Baredes, S, Eloy, JA. Rhinology fellowship training and its scholarly impact. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013;27(5):e131–e134.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals19. Meho, LI . The rise and rise of citation analysis. Phys World. 2007;20(1):32–36.
Google Scholar | Crossref20. Vucovich, LA, Baker, JB, Smith, JT Analyzing the impact of an author’s publications. J Med Libr Assoc. 2008;96(1):63–66.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Fontelo, P, Liu, F. A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):147.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Riley, CA, Soneru, CP, Husain, Q, Gray, ST, Senior, BA, Tabaee, A. Faculty attitudes toward rhinology fellowship training: a survey of rhinology fellowship programs. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2019;33(1):8–16.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals23. Doja, A, Eady, K, Horsley, T, et al. The h-index in medical education: an analysis of medical education journal editorial boards. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14: 251.
Google Scholar | Crossref24. Costas, R, Franssen, T. Reflections around ‘the cautionary use’ of the h-index: response to Teixeira da Silva and Dobránszki. Scientometrics. 2018;115(2):1125–1130.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Kreiner, G . The slavery of the h-index-measuring the unmeasurable. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:556.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline26. Jin, B, Liang, L, Rousseau, R, Egghe, L. The R- and AR-indices: complementing the h-index. Chin Sci Bull. 2007;52(6):855–863.
Google Scholar | Crossref

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif