1. International Agency for Research on Cancer . Breast–Globocan. Geneva: WHO, 2020. Available at: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/20-Breast-fact-sheet.pdf (accessed 9 March 2021).
Google Scholar2. Bray, F, Ferlay, J, Soerjomataram, I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394–424.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. WHO . WHO position paper on mammography screening. Geneva: WHO, 2014. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/137339/9789241507936_eng.pdf (accessed 11 September 2020).
Google Scholar4. Njor, S, Nyström, L, Moss, S, et al. Breast cancer mortality in mammographic screening in Europe: a review of incidence-based mortality studies. J Med Screen 2012; 19(Suppl 1): 33–41.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals5. Meystre, NR, Henner, A, Sà dos Reis, C, et al. Characterization of radiographers’ mammography practice in five European countries: a pilot study. Insights Imaging 2019; 10: 1–11.
Google Scholar | Medline6. Rauscher, GH, Conant, EF, Khan, JA, et al. Mammogram image quality as a potential contributor to disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis: an observational study. BMC Cancer 2013; 13: 208.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Guertin, MH, Théberge, I, Dufresne, MP, et al. Clinical image quality in daily practice of breast cancer mammography screening. Can Assoc Radiol J 2014; 65: 199–206.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals8. Waade, GG, Sebuødegård, S, Hogg, P, et al. Breast compression across consecutive examinations among females participating in BreastScreen Norway. Br J Radiol 2018; 91: 20180209.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Branderhorst, W, de Groot, JE, Highnam, R, et al. Mammographic compression–a need for mechanical standardization. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84: 596–602.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Mercer, CE, Hogg, P, Szczepura, K, et al. Practitioner compression force variation in mammography: a 6-year study. Radiography 2013; 19: 200–206.
Google Scholar | Crossref11. Mercer, CE, Hogg, P, Lawson, R, et al. Practitioner compression force variability in mammography: a preliminary study. Br J Radiol 2013; 86: 20110596.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Serwan, E, Matthews, D, Davies, J, et al. Mechanical standardisation of mammographic compression using Volpara software. Radiography 2020; 27: 789–794.
Google Scholar | Crossref13. Waade, GG, Moshina, N, Sebuødegård, S, et al. Compression forces used in the Norwegian breast cancer screening program. Br J Radiol 2017; 90: 20160770.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Mercer, CE, Szczepura, K, Kelly, J, et al. A 6-year study of mammographic compression force: Practitioner variability within and between screening sites. Radiography 2014; 21: 68–73.
Google Scholar | Crossref15. Dzidzornu, E, Angmorterh, SK, Ofori-Manteaw, BB, et al. Compression force variability in mammography in Ghana–a baseline study. Radiography 2020; 27: 150–155.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Waade, GG, Sanderud, A, Hofvind, S. Compression force and radiation dose in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. Eur J Radiol 2016; 88: 41–46.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Cohen, EO, Tso, HH, Phalak, KA, et al. Screening mammography findings from one standard projection only in the era of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis. AJR 2018; 211: 445–451.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Murphy, F, Nightingale, J, Hogg, P, et al. Compression force behaviours: an exploration of the beliefs and values influencing the application of breast compression during screening mammography. Radiography 2014; 21: 30–35.
Google Scholar | Crossref19. Moshina, N, Sagstad, S, Sebuødegård, S, et al. Breast compression and reported pain during mammographic screening. Radiography 2019; 26: 133–139.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Perry, N, Broeders, M, de Wolf, C, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. 4th ed.. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2006. Available at: https://www.euref.org/downloads?download=24:european-guidelines-for-quality-assurance-in-breast-cancer-screening-and-diagnosis-pdf (accessed 24 September 2020).
Google Scholar21. Dustler, M, Andersson, I, Brorson, Het al. Breast compression in mammography: pressure distribution patterns. Acta Radiologica 2012; 5: 973–980.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals22. Dustler, M, Andersson, I, Förnviket al. The effect of breast positioning on breast compression in mammography: a pressure distribution perspective. Proc. of SPIE 2012; 8313: 83134M.
Google Scholar | Crossref23. Dustler, M, Förnvik, D, Timberg, Pet al. Distribution of pressure on the breast in mammography using flexible and rigid compression plates: implications on patient handling. Acta Radiologica 2021; 12: 1583–1591.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals24. Dustler, M, Förnvik, D, Timberg, Pet al. Can mechanical imaging increase the specificity of mammography screening? European Radiology 2017; 27: 3217–3225.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. GE Healthcare . Senographe pristina mammography system. https://www.gehealthcare.se/products/mammography/senographe-pristina (accessed 16 September 2020).
Google Scholar26. Tekscan . Body pressure measurement system (BPMS)–research. https://www.tekscan.com/products-solutions/systems/body-pressure-measurement-system-bpms-research (accessed 16 September 2020).
Google Scholar27. Folkhälsomyndigheten (the Public Health Agency of Sweden) . Overweight and obesity. https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/livsvillkor-levnadsvanor/fysisk-aktivitet-och-matvanor/overvikt-och-fetma/ (accessed 10 February 2021).
Google Scholar28. Koo, TK, Li, MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15: 155–163.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI29. Schuck, P . Assessing reproducibility for interval data in health-related quality of life questionnaires: which coefficient should be used? Qual Life Res 2004; 13: 571–586.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI30. Dumky, H, Leifland, K, Fridell, K. The art of mammography with respect to positioning and compression–a Swedish perspective. J Radiol Nurs 2017; 37: 41–48.
Google Scholar | Crossref31. Brimacombe, JM, Wilson, DR, Hodgson, AJ, et al. Effect of calibration method on tekscan sensor accuracy. J Biomech Eng 2009; 131: 034503.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI