1. Toney-Butler, TJ, Unison-Pace, WJ. Nursing admission assessment and examination. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing LLC., 2020.
Google Scholar2. Jefferies, D, Johnson, M, Griffiths, R. A meta-study of the essentials of quality nursing documentation. Int J Nurs Pract 2010; 16(2): 112–124.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI3. Johnson, M, Jefferies, D, Langdon, R. The Nursing and Midwifery Content Audit Tool (NMCAT): a short nursing documentation audit tool. J Nurs Manag 2010; 18(7): 832–845.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Søndergaard, SF, Lorentzen, V, Sørensen, EE, et al. The documentation practice of perioperative nurses: a literature review. J Clin Nurs 2017; 26(13–14): 1757–1769.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Blair, W, Smith, B. Nursing documentation: frameworks and barriers. Contemp Nurse 2012; 41(2): 160–168.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Collins, SA, Vawdrey, DK. ‘Reading between the lines’ of flow sheet data: nurses’ optional documentation associated with cardiac arrest outcomes. Appl Nurs Res 2012; 25(4): 251–257.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Kamil, H, Rachmah, R, Wardani, E. What is the problem with nursing documentation? Perspective of Indonesian nurses. Intl J of Africa Nurs Sci 2018; 9: 111–114.
Google Scholar | Crossref8. Gesner, E, Gazarian, P, Dykes, P. The burden and burnout in documenting patient care: an integrative literature review. Stud Health Technol Inform 2019; 264: 1194–1198.
Google Scholar | Medline9. Thompson, I, Melia, K, Boyd, K, et al. Nursing ethics. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2006.
Google Scholar10. Grace, PJ . Professional advocacy: widening the scope of accountability. Nurs Phil 2001; 2(2): 151–162.
Google Scholar | Crossref11. McCarthy, B, Fitzgerald, S, O’Shea, M, et al. Electronic nursing documentation interventions to promote or improve patient safety and quality care: a systematic review. J Nurs Manag 2019; 27(3): 491–501.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Weaver, K, Morse, J, Mitcham, C. Ethical sensitivity in professional practice: concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 2008; 62(5): 607–618.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI13. Gillon, R . Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ 1994; 309(6948): 184–188.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Gillon, R . Ethics needs principles – four can encompass the rest – and respect for autonomy should be ‘first among equals’. J Med Ethics 2003; 29(5): 307–312.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI15. Molina-Mula, J, Gallo-Estrada, J. Impact of nurse-patient relationship on quality of care and patient autonomy in decision-making. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(3): 835.
Google Scholar | Crossref16. Kollerup, MG, Vinther, KK, Jørgensen, L. Patient participation in nursing documentation: a qualitative descriptive study. Nordic J Nurs Res 2020; 40(4): 197–204.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals17. Graneheim, UH, Lundman, B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004; 24(2): 105–112.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI18. Graneheim, UH, Lindgren, BM, Lundman, B. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: a discussion paper. Nurse Educ Today 2017; 56: 29–34.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI19. Tong, A, Sainsbury, P, Craig, J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Intl J Qual Health Care 2007; 19(6): 349–357.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI20. Morgan, DL . Focus groups as qualitative research: planning and research design for focus groups. 2nd ed. London: Sage Research Methods, 1997.
Google Scholar | Crossref21. Morrison-Beedy, D, Côté-Arsenault, D, Feinstein, NF. Maximizing results with focus groups: moderator and analysis issues. Appl Nurs Res 2001; 14(1): 48–53.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI22. Morgan, DL . Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd ed. London: Sage Research Methods, 1997.
Google Scholar | Crossref23. Morse, JM . Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res 2015; 25(9): 1212–1222.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI24. Northern Nurses´ Federation . Ethical guidelines for nursing research in the Nordic countries, 2003, https://ssn-norden.dk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/ssns_etiske_retningslinjer_0-003.pdf
Google Scholar25. Smeulers, M, Lucas, C, Vermeulen, H. Effectiveness of different nursing handover styles for ensuring continuity of information in hospitalised patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 6: CD009979.
Google Scholar26. McCloskey, RM, Furlong, KE, Hansen, L. Patient, family and nurse experiences with patient presence during handovers in acute care hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2019; 17(5): 754–792.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. Haahr, A, Norlyk, A, Martinsen, B, et al. Nurses experiences of ethical dilemmas: a review. Nurs Ethics 2020; 27(1): 258–272.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI28. Delmar, C. Becoming whole: Kari Martinsen’s philosophy of care – selected concepts and impact on clinical nursing. Intl J Human Caring 2013; 17(3): 20–28.
Google Scholar | Crossref29. Beauchamp, TL, Childress, J. Beneficence: principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Google Scholar30. Holden, RJ . Responsibility and autonomous nursing practice. J Adv Nurs 1991; 16(4): 398–403.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline31. International Council of Nurses . The ICN code of ethics for nurses. Geneva: International Council of Nurses, 2012.
Google Scholar32. Råd, Sygeplejeetisk . De sygeplejeetiske retningslinjer [Ethical guidelines for nurses]. Danish Council of Nursing Ethics, 2014.
Google Scholar33. Verkerk, MA . The care perspective and autonomy. Med Health Care Philos 2001; 4(3): 289–294.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline34. Gastmans, C . The care perspective in healthcare ethics. In: Davis, A, Tschudin, V, De Raeve, L (eds) Essentials of teaching and learning in nursing ethics: perspectives and methods. Maryland Heights, MO: Elsevier, 2006, pp. 135–162.
Google Scholar35. Feo, R, Kitson, A. Promoting patient-centred fundamental care in acute healthcare systems. Int J Nurs Stud 2016; 57: 1–11.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline36. Broderick, MC, Coffey, A. Person-centred care in nursing documentation. Int J Older People Nurs 2013; 8(4): 309–318.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline37. Dorvil, B . The secrets to successful nurse bedside shift report implementation and sustainability. Nurs Manage 2018; 49(6): 20–25.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline38. Nygaard, AM, Haugdahl, HS, Brinchmann, BS, et al. Information concerning ICU patients’ families in the handover-the clinicians’ «game of whispers»: a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs 2020; 29(19–20): 3822–3834.
Google Scholar | Medline39. Collins, SA, Cato, K, Albers, D, et al. Relationship between nursing documentation and patients’ mortality. Am J Crit Care 2013; 22(4): 306–313.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI40. De Groot, K, Triemstra, M, Paans, W, et al. Quality criteria, instruments, and requirements for nursing documentation: a systematic review of systematic reviews. J Adv Nurs 2019; 75(7): 1379–1393.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline41. Allen, D . The invisible work of nurses: hospitals, organisation and healthcare. London: Routledge, 2015.
Google Scholar42. The Danish Agency for Patient Complaints . Danish agency for patient complaints in numbers 2015-2020, 2020, https://stpk.dk/om-os/stpk-i-tal/
Google Scholar43. Sandelowski, M . When a cigar is not just a cigar: alternative takes on data and data analysis. Res Nurs Health 2011; 34(4): 342–352.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline