Discrepancy between preoperative endometrial sampling and hysterectomy diagnosis in endometrial cancer

Keywords: endometrial cancer, endometrial sampling versus hysterectomy diagnosis

Abstract

Background: A study was conducted to determine the accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling histology type and tumour grade results compared with the final postoperative diagnosis.

Methods: This was a retrospective chart audit of patients with endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia admitted to Grey’s Hospital in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, from January 2013 to December 2017.

Results: Sixty patients met the inclusion criteria. For endometrial cancer histological types, the accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling was 94.7% (36/38) for endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 42.9% (3/7) for serous papillary carcinoma, 85.7% (6/7) for carcinosarcoma and 75% (9/12) for atypical hyperplasia. A kappa value of 0.825 was obtained with a p-value of 0.000 for agreement between preoperative endometrial sampling and the final postoperative diagnosis. For endometrioid adenocarcinoma tumour grading 1–3 (G1–3), only 16/38 (42.1%) patients met the criteria to compare the pre- and postoperative results, which were as follows: of the eight patients with grade 1 tumour on preoperative sampling one patient (1.25%) was upgraded to grade 2 tumour postoperatively. There were no changes in tumour grading for grade 2 and 3 tumours, 3/3 and 5/5 respectively.

Conclusion: Our study results for endometrioid adenocarcinoma are comparable to previous literature. However, there were significant discrepancies for non-endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Deficiencies that need to be addressed by laboratories in order to improve both preoperative surgical staging and postoperative adjuvant therapy planning were also highlighted.

Author Biographies

S E Mhlongo, Universiteit van KwaZulu-Natal

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Grey’s Hospital, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa

T D Naidoo, Universiteit van KwaZulu-Natal

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Grey’s Hospital, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa

B S Makhathini, Universiteit van KwaZulu-Natal

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Grey’s Hospital, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg and Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

Section

Original Research

By submitting manuscripts to SAJGO, authors of original articles are assigning copyright to the South African Society of Gynaecologic Oncology (SASGO). Authors may use their own work after publication without written permission, provided they acknowledge the original source. Individuals and academic institutions may freely copy and distribute articles published in SAJGO for educational and research purposes without obtaining permission.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif