Guests with Guns: Public Support for “No Carry” Defaults on Private Land

1. See generally, Concealed Carry, Giffords Law Center, available at <https://lawcenter.giffords.org/gun-laws/policy-areas/guns-in-public/concealed-carry> ().
Google Scholar2. Korobkin, R. , “The Status Quo Bias and Contract Default Rules,” Cornell Law Review 83 (1998): 608–687, at 615.
Google Scholar3. Ayres, I., Gertner, R., “Filling Gaps in Incomplete Contracts: An Economic Theory of Default Rules,” Yale Law Journal 99 (1989): 87-130, at 93.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI4. See generally, Ayres, I. , “Regulating Opt-Out: An Economic Theory of Altering Rules,” Yale Law Journal 121 (2012): 2032-2116.
Google Scholar5. Ayres, I., Vars, F., Weapon of Choice: Fighting Gun Violence While Respecting Gun Rights (Harvard University Press, forthcoming).
Google Scholar6. See Concealed Carry, supra note 1.
Google Scholar7. Id.
Google Scholar8. La. Stat. Ann. § 1379.3 (West 2020).
Google Scholar9. S.C. Code Ann. § 23-31-225 (West 2019).
Google Scholar10. D.C. Code Ann. § 7-2509.07 (West 2019).
Google Scholar11. Ark. Code. Ann. § 5-73-306 (West 2019).
Google Scholar12. Alaska Stat. Ann. § 11.61.220 (West 2019).
Google Scholar13. Tex. Parks & Wild. Code Ann. § 62.012 (West 2019).
Google Scholar14. N.C. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 14-159.7 (West 2018).
Google Scholar15. Mo. Ann. Stat. § 569.145 (West 2020).
Google Scholar16. Vt. Stat. Ann. Tit. 10, § 5201 (West 2019).
Google Scholar17. See, e.g., Mo. Ann. Stat. § 571.107 (West 2020).
Google Scholar18. See, e.g., supra note 12.
Google Scholar19. See, e.g., Miss. Code Ann. § 45-9-101 (West 2019); Tex. Penal Code Ann. §30.06 (West 2019).
Google Scholar20. See, e.g., Wis. Stat. Ann. § 175.60 (West 2019).
Google Scholar21. Location Restrictions , Giffords Law Center, available at <https://lawcenter.giffords.org/gun-laws/policy-areas/guns-in-public/location-restrictions/> ().
Google Scholar22. Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 237.106 (West 2019).
Google Scholar23. See, e.g., Minn. Stat. Ann. § 624.714 (West 2019).
Google Scholar24. See, e.g., Miss. Code. Ann. §45-9-51 (West 2019).
Google Scholar25. D.C. Code Ann. § 22-4503.02 (West 2019).
Google Scholar26. A more detailed explanation can be found in the online appendix. YouGov has also been used in, Ayres, I., Vars, F., “Gun Owners Support the Right Not to Bear Arms,” Emory Law Review (forthcoming).
Google Scholar27. The full survey can be found in the Online Appendix.
Google Scholar28. The survey also randomized the order in which vignettes were presented and subjects were randomized into two groups: in one group, “No” appeared first throughout the survey, and in the other, “Yes” appeared first (with “I don't know” always appearing at the end).
Google Scholar29. Analogous results by state are available in Online Appendix Table A4. We also present similar tables for beliefs about what the law is by region and state in Online Appendix Tables A5 and A6, respectively.
Google Scholar30. Appendix Table A7 presents linear regressions testing for treatment effects on each question — both with and without controls — and finds statistically significant treatment effects. Specifically, the “explicit consent” group was 10.5 percentage points less likely than the “No Trespassing” to say that the law should by default allow such hunting and 33 percentage points less likely to believe that that their state had such a law. This aspect of the experiments shows that altering rules can materially impact public support for the law. See Ayres, supra note 5.
Google Scholar31. 60.8% of individuals said businesses should have immunity if they prevented individuals from carrying guns, while 61.1% said businesses should have immunity if they allowed individuals to carry guns. These differences were not statistically significant (p. > .8).
Google Scholar32. The landowner-frame made respondents less likely to support tenants carrying firearms in rented property and the “carry” default for hunting on private land. See Appendix Table A7.
Google Scholar33. Gangitano, A., Wong, S., “Here Are the Gun Policies for America's Largest Retailers,” Hill, September 7, 2019.
Google Scholar34. Id.
Google Scholar35. Corkery, M. , “Retailers Walk Thin Line by Asking, Not Telling, Shoppers Not to Carry Guns,” New York Times, September 9, 2019.
Google Scholar36. See, e.g., Miller, J.R. , “Tenant Allegedly Shot Landlord in the Head Over $30 Rent Hike,” New York Post, March 8, 2018.
Google Scholar37. District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, (2008).
Google Scholar38. New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc., et al. v. City of New York, et. al., 590 U.S. __, (2020).
Google Scholar39. Concealed Deadly Weapons Legal: Hearing on H.B. 102 Before the H. State Affairs Standing Comm., 2003 Leg., 23th Sess., (Ak. April 8, 2003) (statement by Lauree Hugonin, Executive Director of ANDVSA).
Google Scholar40. See Stolen Guns Pose a Tremendous Risk to Public Safety, Everytown, available at <https://everytownresearch.org/stolen-guns-pose-tremendous-risk-public-safety> (October 8, 2020).
Google Scholar

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif