Subjective and Objective Change in Cervical Spine Mobility After Single-level Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: Erratum

In the September 15, 2021 issue of Spine in the article by Scholz et al, “Subjective and Objective Change in Cervical

Spine Mobility After Single-level Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion”, the reference list was not correct, starting with reference number 9.

Below is the correct reference list:

9. Ellert U, Lampert T, Ravens-Sieberer U. Measuring health-related quality of life with the SF-8. Normal sample of the German population. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2005;48:1330–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-005-1168-5.

10. Bullinger M, Morfeld M, Kohlmann T, et al. SF-36 Health Survey in Rehabilitation Research. Findings from the North German Network for Rehabilitation Research, NVRF, within the rehabilitation research funding program. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 2003;42:218–25. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-41645.

11. Scholz C, Klingler J-H, Masalha W, Naseri Y, Hohenhaus M, Hubbe U. Laminectomy and fusion in multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy -How severely do patients feel restricted by a postoperatively reduced mobility of the cervical spine? Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 2020;197:106160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106160.

12. Audette I, Dumas J-P, Côté JN, De Serres SJ. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010;40:318–23. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2010.3180.

13. Florêncio LL, Pereira PA, Silva ERT, Pegoretti KS, Gonçalves MC, Bevilaqua-Grossi D. Agreement and reliability of two non-invasive methods for assessing cervical range of motion among young adults. Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia (Sao Carlos (Sao Paulo, Brazil)) 2010;14:175–81.

14. Whitcroft KL, Massouh L, Amirfeyz R, Bannister G. Comparison of methods of measuring active cervical range of motion. Spine 2010;35:E976-980. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cd6176.

15. Simpson AK, Biswas D, Emerson JW, Lawrence BD, Grauer JN. Quantifying the effects of age, gender, degeneration, and adjacent level degeneration on cervical spine range of motion using multivariate analyses. Spine 2008;33:183–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816044e8.

16. Kasliwal MK, Witiw CD, Traynelis VC. Neck range of motion following cervical spinal fusion: A comparison of patient-centered and objective assessments. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016;151:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.09.020.

17. Kaminsky S, Clark C, Traynelis V. Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy. Iowa Orthop J 2004;24:95–105.

18. Fredø HL, Rizvi SAM, Rezai M, Rønning P, Lied B, Helseth E. Complications and long-term outcomes after open surgery for traumatic subaxial cervical spine fractures: a consecutive series of 303 patients. BMC Surg 2016;16:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0172-z.

19. Hilibrand AS, Balasubramanian K, Eichenbaum M, et al. The effect of anterior cervical fusion on neck motion. Spine 2006;31:1688–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000224165.66444.71.

20. Landers MR, Addis KA, Longhurst JK, Vom Steeg B, Puentedura EJ, Daubs MD. Anterior cervical decompression and fusion on neck range of motion, pain, and function: a prospective analysis. Spine 2013;13:1650–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.020.

21. Wu X-D, Wang X-W, Yuan W, et al. The effect of multilevel anterior cervical fusion on neck motion. Eur Spine J 2012;21:1368–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2157-7.

22. Okamoto A, Shinomiya K, Furuya K. Reduced neck movement after operations for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Int Orthop 1995;19:295–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00181113.

23. Malmström E-M, Karlberg M, Fransson PA, Melander A, Magnusson M. Primary and coupled cervical movements: the effect of age, gender, and body mass index. A 3-dimensional movement analysis of a population without symptoms of neck disorders. Spine 2006;31:E44-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000194841.83419.0b.

24. Peolsson A, Söderlund A, Engquist M, et al. Physical function outcome in cervical radiculopathy patients after physiotherapy alone compared with anterior surgery followed by physiotherapy: a prospective randomized study with a 2-year follow-up. Spine 2013;38:300–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826d2cbb.

25. Kolstad F, Nygaard ØP, Leivseth G. Segmental motion adjacent to anterior cervical arthrodesis: a prospective study. Spine 2007;32:512–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000256448.04035.bb.

26. Reitman CA, Hipp JA, Nguyen L, Esses SI. Changes in segmental intervertebral motion adjacent to cervical arthrodesis: a prospective study. Spine 2004;29:E221-226. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200406010-00022.

Scholz, C, Masalha, W, Naseri, Y, et al. Subjective and objective change in cervical spine mobility after single-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine 2021; 46: 1241–1248.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif