1. Smith, EE, Fang, J, Alibhai, SM, et al. Derivation and external validation of a scoring system for predicting fracture risk after ischemic stroke in a Canadian cohort. JAMA Neurol 2019; 76: 925–931.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Peltier, A, Goutman, SA, Callaghan, BC. Painful diabetic neuropathy. Br Med J 2014; 348: g1799.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Vieira, ER, Palmer, RC, Chaves, PH. Prevention of falls in older people living in the community. Br Med J 2016; 353: i1419.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Murphy, J, Isaacs, B. The post-fall syndrome. Gerontology 1982; 28: 265–270.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI5. Patil, R, Uusi-Rasi, K, Kannus, P, et al. Concern about falling in older women with a history of falls: associations with health, functional ability, physical activity and quality of life. Gerontology 2014; 60: 22–30.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Tinetti, ME, De Leon, CFM, Doucette, JT, et al. Fear of falling and fall-related efficacy in relationship to functioning among community-living elders. J Gerontol 1994; 49: M140–M147.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Prestmo, A, Hagen, G, Sletvold, O, et al. Comprehensive geriatric care for patients with hip fractures: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet 2015; 385: 1623–1633.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI8. Yardley, L, Beyer, N, Hauer, K, et al. Development and initial validation of the falls efficacy scale-international (FES-I). Age Ageing 2005; 34: 614–619.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI9. van de Port, IG, Wevers, LE, Lindeman, E, et al. Effects of circuit training as alternative to usual physiotherapy after stroke: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 344: 1–10.
Google Scholar10. Kempen, GI, Todd, CJ, Van Haastregt, JC, et al. Cross-cultural validation of the falls efficacy scale international (FES-I) in older people: results from Germany, the Netherlands and the UK were satisfactory. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 155–162.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI11. Hobart, JC, Cano, SJ, Zajicek, JP, et al. Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations. The Lancet Neurology 2007; 6: 1094–1105.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI12. Wright, BD, Mok, MM. An overview of the family of rasch measurement models. Introduction to Rasch measurement 2004: 1–24.
Google Scholar13. Wright, BD, Linacre, JM. Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 70: 857–860.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI14. Draak, TH, Vanhoutte, EK, Van Nes, SI, et al. Changing outcome in inflammatory neuropathies: rasch–comparative responsiveness. Neurology 2014; 83: 2124–2132.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Caronni, A, Donzelli, S, Zaina, F, et al. The Italian spine youth quality of life questionnaire measures health-related quality of life of adolescents with spinal deformities better than the reference standard, the scoliosis research society 22 questionnaire. Clin Rehabil 2019; 33: 1404–1415.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI16. Caronni, A, Picardi, M, Gilardone, G, et al. The McNemar change index worked better than the minimal detectable change in demonstrating the change at a single subject level. J Clin Epidemiol 2021; 131: 79–88.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Delbaere, K, Close, JC, Mikolaizak, AS, et al. The falls efficacy scale international (FES-I). A comprehensive longitudinal validation study. Age Ageing 2010; 39: 210–216.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI18. Podsiadlo, D, Richardson, S. The timed ‘Up & Go’: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 142–148.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI19. Keith, RA, Granger, CV, Hamilton, BB, et al. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 6–18.
Google Scholar | Medline20. Ruggiero, C, Mariani, T, Gugliotta, R, et al. Validation of the Italian version of the falls efficacy scale international (FES-I) and the short FES-I in community-dwelling older persons. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2009; 49: 211–219.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Franchignoni, F, Horak, F, Godi, M, et al. Using psychometric techniques to improve the balance evaluation systems test: the mini-BESTest J Rehabil Med 2010; 42: 323–331.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI22. Caronni, A, Picardi, M, Aristidou, E, et al. How do patients improve their timed up and go test? Responsiveness to rehabilitation of the TUG test in elderly neurological patients. Gait Posture 2019; 70: 33–38.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. Sibley, KM, Howe, T, Lamb, SE, et al. Recommendations for a core outcome set for measuring standing balance in adult populations: a consensus-based approach. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0120568.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Smith, . Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas 2002; 3: 205–231.
Google Scholar | Medline25. Mallinson, T . Rasch analysis of repeated measures. Rasch measurement transactions 25: 1317.
Google Scholar26. Caronni, A, Sciumè, L. Is my patient actually getting better? Application of the McNemar test for demonstrating the change at a single subject level. Disabil Rehabil 2017; 39: 1341–1347.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. Duncan, PW, Lai, SM, Bode, RK, et al. Stroke impact scale-16: a brief assessment of physical function. Neurology 2003; 60: 291–296.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI28. Hagquist, C, Due, P, Torsheim, T, et al. Cross-country comparisons of trends in adolescent psychosomatic symptoms–a rasch analysis of HBSC data from four nordic countries. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019; 17: 1–13.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline29. Hobart, J, Riazi, A, Thompson, A, et al. Getting the measure of spasticity in multiple sclerosis: the multiple sclerosis spasticity scale (MSSS-88). Brain 2006; 129: 224–234.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI30. Baghaei, P . The rasch model as a construct validation tool. Rasch Measurement Transactions 2008; 22: 1145–1146.
Google Scholar31. Park, EY, Im Choi, Y. Investigation of psychometric properties of the falls efficacy scale using rasch analysis in patients with hemiplegic stroke. J Phys Ther Sci 2015; 27: 2829–2832.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline32. van Vliet, R, Hoang, P, Lord, S, et al. Falls efficacy scale-international: a cross-sectional validation in people with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94: 883–889.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI33. Tooth, LR, Ottenbacher, KJ, Smith, PM, et al. Effect of functional gain on satisfaction with medical rehabilitation after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 82: 692–699.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline