Background

The Papanicolaou Society of cytopathology developed a six-category system for pancreaticobiliary cytology specimens. Each category is associated with a definition, diagnostic criteria, estimated risk of malignancy and management recommendations. Risks of malignancy are well defined for specimens obtained by fine-needle aspiration but are less well defined for brushing specimens.

Methods

Diagnoses of 232 brushing specimens of the pancreatic and bile ducts were correlated with diagnoses from subsequent surgical or cytologic specimens. Sensitivity for the brushing technique was calculated. Risk of malignancy was calculated for each category using the original definitions for nondiagnostic and negative categories and for those of a modified system.

Results

Diagnostic sensitivity was 60%–64%. Risk of malignancy for the nondiagnostic, negative, atypical, suspicious for malignancy, and malignant categories was 28%, 28%, 61%, 91%, and 91%, respectively, when the original category definitions were used.

Conclusions

Diagnostic sensitivity for duct brushings is low in comparison to fine-needle aspiration. Risk of malignancy is comparable to that of needle aspiration for the negative, atypical and suspicious categories but lower for the malignant category. There is a stepwise increase in malignancy risk as one moves from the negative to the atypical to the suspicious for malignancy categories.