Evaluation of an Integrated Smart Sensor System for Real-Time Characterization and Digitalization of Postoperative Abdominal Drain Output: A Pilot Study

Background: For centuries, surgeons have relied on surgical drains during postoperative care. Despite all advances in modern medicine and the area of digitalization, as of today, most if not all assessment of abdominal secretions excreted via surgical drains are carried out manually. We here introduce a novel integrated Smart Sensor System (Smart Drain) that allows for real-time characterization and digitalization of postoperative abdominal drain output at the patient’s bedside. Methods: A prototype of the Smart Drain was developed using a sophisticated spectrometer for assessment of drain output. The prototype measures 10 × 6 × 6 cm and therefore easily fits at the bedside. At the time of measurement with our Smart Drain, the drain output was additionally sent off to be analyzed in our routine laboratory for typical markers of interest in abdominal surgery such as bilirubin, lipase, amylase, triglycerides, urea, protein, and red blood cells. A total of 45 samples from 19 patients were included. Results: The measurements generated were found to correlate with conventional laboratory measurements for bilirubin (r = .658, P = .000), lipase (r = .490, P = .002), amylase (r = .571, P = .000), triglycerides (r = .803, P = .000), urea (r = .326, P = .033), protein (r = .387, P = .012), and red blood cells (r = .904, P = .000). Conclusions: To our best knowledge, for the first time we describe a device using a sophisticated spectrometer that allows for real-time characterization and digitalization of postoperative abdominal drain output at the patient’s bedside.

1. Liehn, M, Lengersdorf, B, Steinmüller, L, Döhler, R. OP-Handbuch. 2016.
Google Scholar2. Schein, M . To drain or not to drain? The role of drainage in the contaminated and infected abdomen: an international and personal perspective. World J Surg. 2008;32(2):312-321.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI3. Boyle, EM, Gillinov, AM, Cohn, WE, Ley, SJ, Fischlein, T, Perrault, LP. Retained blood syndrome after cardiac surgery: a new look at an old problem. Innovat Tech Tech CardioThorac Vasc Surg. 2015;10(5):296-303.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals4. Lyons, N, Heron, P, Bethune, R. Improving the recording of surgical drain output. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015;4(1).
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Tsang, LF, Cheng, HC, Ho, HS, et al. Translating evidence-based protocol of wound drain management for total joint arthroplasty into practice: a quasi-experimental study. Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2016;21:49-61.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. van Duren, BH, van Boxel, GI. A novel method for electronic measurement and recording of surgical drain output. J Med Eng Technol. 2017;41(3):179-185.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Zhang, W, He, S, Cheng, Y, et al. Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;6:CD010583.
Google Scholar | Medline8. Globke, B, Schmelzle, M, Bahra, M, Pratschke, J, Neudecker, J. Drainages in abdominal surgery: (in)dispensable? Chirurg. 2017;88(5):395-400.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Mark McEwen, KJR . Noninvasive detection of bilirubin using pulsatile absorption. Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine. 2006;29:78-83.
Google Scholar | Medline10. Nitzan, M, Romem, A, Koppel, R. Pulse oximetry: fundamentals and technology update. Med Devices (Auckl). 2014;7:231-239.
Google Scholar | Medline

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif