1. Priya, VS, Iyappan, K, Gayathri, VS, et al. Influence of pullulan hydrogel on sutureless wound healing in rats. Wound Med 2016; 14: 1–5.
Google Scholar | Crossref2. Eming, SA, Martin, P, Tomic-Canic, M. Wound repair and regeneration: mechanisms, signaling, and translation. Sci Transl Med 2014; 6(265): 265sr6.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI3. Fan, X, Chen, K, He, X, et al. Nano-TiO2/collagen-chitosan porous scaffold for wound repairing. Int J Biol Macromol 2016; 91: 15–22.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Alven, S, Aderibigbe, BA. Chitosan and cellulose-based hydrogels for wound management. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21: 9656.
Google Scholar | Crossref5. Garg, RK, Rennert, RC, Duscher, D, et al. Capillary force seeding of hydrogels for adipose-derived stem cell delivery in wounds. Stem Cells Transl Med 2014; 3: 1079–1089.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Dong, X, Chang, J, Li, H. Bioglass promotes wound healing through modulating the paracrine effects between macrophages and repairing cells. J Mater Chem B 2017; 5(26).
Google Scholar | Crossref7. Nokhasteh, S, Avalshahr, AS, Molavi, AM, et al. Effect of bioactive glass nanoparticles on biological properties of PLGA/collagen scaffold. Prog Biomater 2018; 7: 111–119.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Vukajlovic, D, Parker, J, Bretcanu, O, et al. Chitosan based polymer/bioglass composites for tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C 2019; 96: 955–967.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Faure, J, Drevet, R, Lemelle, A, et al. A new sol–gel synthesis of 45S5 bioactive glass using an organic acid as catalyst. Mater Sci Eng C 2015; 47: 407–412.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Sathya Seeli, D, Prabaharan, M. Guar gum succinate as a carrier for colon-specific drug delivery. Int J Biol Macromol 2016; 84: 10–15.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Soubhagya, AS, Moorthi, A, Prabaharan, M. Preparation and characterization of chitosan/pectin/ZnO porous films for wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol 2020; 157: 135–145.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Singh, TP, Chatli, MK, Sahoo, J. Development of chitosan based edible films: process optimization using response surface methodology. J Food Sci Technol 2015; 52(5): 2530–2543.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Sivashankari, PR, Moorthi, A, Abudhahir, KM, et al. Preparation and characterization of three-dimensional scaffolds based on hydroxypropyl chitosan-graft-graphene oxide. Int J Biol Macromol 2018; 110: 522–530.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Sathya Seeli, D, Prabaharan, M. Guar gum oleate-graft-poly(methacrylic acid) hydrogel as a colon-specific controlled drug delivery carrier. Carbohydr Polym 2017; 158: 51–57.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Tang, ZX, Lv, BF. MgO nanoparticles as antibacterial agent: preparation and activity. Braz J Chem Eng 2014; 31: 591–601.
Google Scholar | Crossref16. Governa, P, Carullo, G, Biagi, M, et al. Evaluation of the in vitro wound-healing activity of calabrian honeys. Antioxidants 2019; 8: 36.
Google Scholar | Crossref17. Pirayesh, H, Nychka, JA. Sol–gel synthesis of bioactive glass-ceramic 45S5 and its in vitro dissolution and mineralization behaviour. J Am Ceram Soc 2013; 96: 1643–1650.
Google Scholar | Crossref18. Coimbra, P, Ferreira, P, de Sousa, HC. Preparation and chemical and biological characterization of a pectin/chitosan polyelectrolyte complex scaffold for possible bone tissue engineering applications. Int J Biol Macromol 2011; 48: 112–118.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI19. Baino, F, Fiume, E. Elastic mechanical properties of 45S5-based bioactive glass–ceramic scaffolds. Materials 2019; 12: 3244.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Kumar, A, Sevi, M, Aditya, A, et al. Mesoporous 45S5 bioactive glass: synthesis, in vitro dissolution and biomineralization behaviour. J Mater Chem B 2017; 5(44).
Google Scholar | Crossref21. Mocanu, G, Mihai, D, LeCerf, D, et al. Synthesis of new associative gel microspheres from carboxymethyl pullulan and their interactions with lysozyme. Eur Polym J 2004; 40: 283–289.
Google Scholar | Crossref22. Maji, K, Dasgupta, S, Pramanik, K, et al. Preparation and evaluation of gelatin-chitosan-nanobioglass 3D porous scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biomater 2016: 9825659.
Google Scholar | Medline23. Rahman, PM, Abdul Mujeeb, VM, Muraleedharan, K, et al. Chitosan/nano ZnO composite films: Enhanced mechanical, antimicrobial and dielectric properties. Arabian J Chem 2018; 11(1): 120–127.
Google Scholar | Crossref24. Bierhalz, ACK, Westin, CB, Moraes, AM. Comparison of the properties of membranes produced with alginate and chitosan from mushroom and from shrimp. Int J Biol Macromol 2016; 91: 496–504.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Ren, H, Cui, Y, Li, A, et al. Bioactive glass sol as a dual function additive for chitosan-alginate hybrid scaffold. Chin Chem Lett 2018; 29: 395–398.
Google Scholar | Crossref26. Cui, CY, Wang, SN, Ren, HH, et al. Regeneration of dental–pulp complex-like tissue using phytic acid derived bioactive glasses. RSC Adv 2017; 7: 22063.
Google Scholar | Crossref27. Trishala, A, Jacob, C. The anti-bacterial activity of bioactive glass. Int J Adv Res 2016; 4(6): 1070–1077.
Google Scholar | Crossref28. Wen, X, Zheng, Y, Wu, J, et al. In vitro and in vivo investigation of bacterial cellulose dressing containing uniform silver sulfadiazine nanoparticles for burn wound healing. Prog Nat Sci Mater Inter 2015; 25: 197–203.
Google Scholar | Crossref