1. Huang, Y, Li, F, Han, J, et al. Shear wave elastography of breast lesions: quantitative analysis of elastic heterogeneity improves diagnostic performance. Ultrasound Med Biol 2019; 45: 1909–1917.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Chamming’s, F, Mesurolle, B, Antonescu, R, et al. Value of shear wave elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant microcalcifications of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 213: W85–W92.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Liu, G, Zhang, MK, He, Y, et al. BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: could multi-mode ultrasound be helpful for their diagnosis? Gland Surg 2019; 8: 258–270.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Shin, YJ, Kim, SM, Yun, B, et al. Predictors of invasive breast cancer in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ in ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy. J Ultrasound Med 2019; 38: 481–488.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Feng, H, Li, JL, Huang, Y, et al. Quantitative study on the elastic modulus of real-time shear wave for small mammary nodules. Chinese J Ultrasound Med 2013; 29: 782–786.
Google Scholar6. Tozaki, M, Fukuma, E. Pattern classification of Shear Wave™ elastography images for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant solid breast masses. Acta Radiol 2011; 52: 1069–1075.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals7. Berg, WA, Cosgrove, DO, Doré, CJ, et al. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology 2012; 262: 435–449.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Luo, J, Cao, Y, Nian, W, et al. Benefit of shear-wave elastography in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Med Ultrason 2018; 1: 43–49.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Hari, S, Paul, SB, Vidyasagar, R, et al. Breast mass characterization using shear wave elastography and ultrasound. Diagn Interv Imaging 2018; 99: 699–707.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Fujioka, T, Mori, M, Kubota, K, et al. Simultaneous comparison between strain and shear wave elastography of breast masses for the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions by qualitative and quantitative assessments. Breast Cancer 2019; 26: 792–798.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Shang, J, Ruan, LT, Wang, YY, et al. Utilizing size-based thresholds of stiffness gradient to reclassify BI-RADS category 3-4b lesions increases diagnostic performance. Clin Radiol 2019; 74: 306–313.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Gürüf, A, Öztürk, M, Bayrak, İK, et al. Shear wave versus strain elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Turk J Med Sci 2019; 49: 1509–1517.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Yuan, CG, Wei, J. The value of SWE combined with BI-RADS grading in the differential diagnosis of breast masses and the relationship with pathological features. He Bei Medicine 2018; 24: 366–370.
Google Scholar14. Ceng, QJ, Ceng, J, Wu, T, et al. Color image scoring system of shear wave elastography in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solid breast masses. Chin J Med Imaging Technol 2015; 31: 405–408.
Google Scholar15. Suvannarerg, V, Chitchumnong, P, Apiwat, W, et al. Diagnostic performance of qualitative and quantitative shear wave elastography in differentiating malignant from benign breast masses, and association with the histological prognostic factors. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2019; 9: 386–398.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Lin, X, Chang, C, Wu, C, et al. Confirmed value of shear wave elastography for ultrasound characterization of breast masses using a conservative approach in Chinese women: a large-size prospective multicenter trial. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10: 4447–4458.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Wang, YQ, Tang, LN, Liu, NX, et al. Application value of real-time shear wave elastography in distinguish of molecular subtypes in breast invasive ductal carcinoma. Chin J Oncol Prev Treat 2018; 10: 390–392.
Google Scholar18. Deng, MJ, Chen, L, Zhong, N, et al. Comparison on the diagnostic efficiency of RI and elastic modulus in breast BI-RADS classification. Hainan Med 2018; 29: 2568–2570.
Google Scholar19. Shi, XQ, Li, JL, Wan, WB, et al. A set of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters combined with ultrasound BI-RADS to assess benign and malignant breast lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol 2015; 41: 960–966.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Bouchard, RR, Hsu, SJ, Palmeri, ML, et al. Acoustic radiation force driven assessment of myocardial elasticity using the (DRR) method. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011; 37: 1087–1100.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Han, J, Li, AH, Han, F, et al. Study on the methodology of shear wave elastography in the evaluation of breast lesions. Chin J Ultrasound Med 2016; 32: 503–506.
Google Scholar22. Park, HS, Shin, HJ, Shin, KC, et al. Comparison of peritumoral stromal tissue stiffness obtained by shear wave elastography between benign and malignant breast lesions. Acta Radiol 2018; 59: 1168–1175.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals23. Xiang, L, Ma, F, Yao, M, et al. Benign lesion evaluation: factors causing the “stiff rim” sign in breast tissues using shear-wave elastography. Br J Radiol 2019; 92: 20180602.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Gweon, HM, Youk, JH, Son, EJ, et al. Visually assessed colour overlay features in shear-wave elastography for breast masses: quantification and diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 658–663.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Bernal, M, Chamming's, F, Couade, M, et al. In vivo quantification of the nonlinear shear modulus in breast lesions: feasibility study. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2016; 63: 101–109.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline26. Zhou, Y, Yue, QX, Liu, J. The value of ultrasound BI-RADS combined with elastic strain rate ratio in the diagnosis of breast masses. Health Med Res Pract 2016; 13: 77–79.
Google Scholar27. Barr, RG, Nakashima, K, Amy, D, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 2: breast. Ultrasound Med Biol 2015; 41: 1148–1160.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline28. Ceng, QJ, Ceng, J, Zheng, RQ, et al. The value of shear wave elastography in differential diagnosis of breast solid lesions. Chin J Ultrasound Imaging 2014; 23: 129–132.
Google Scholar29. Ng, WL, Rahmat, K, Fadzli, F, et al. Shear wave elastography increases diagnostic accuracy in characterization of breast lesions. Medicine 2016; 95: e3146.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline30. Li, DD, Xu, HX, Guo, LH, et al. Combination of two-dimensional shear wave elastography with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system in the diagnosis of breast lesions: a new method to increase the diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 3290–3300.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline31. Bae, JS, Chang, JM, Lee, SH, et al. Prediction of invasive breast cancer using shear-wave elastography in patients with biopsy-confirmed ductal carcinoma in situ. Eur Radiol 2017; 27: 7–15.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline