Trend research of vitamin D receptor: Bibliometric analysis

Studies on vitamin D receptor (VDR) and its association with multiple disorders are expanding. This bibliometric study aims to find and summarize VDR-related publications, and compare them across various countries, organizations, and journals to demonstrate trends in VDR research. VOSviewer and Excel 2019 were used to classify and summarize Web of Science articles from 1900 to mid-2021. Total records of 8762 articles were analyzed, and maps of co-citations bibliometric keywords co-occurrence were designed. In conclusion, relative research interest and published papers related to VDR were growing in the past 30 years. The United States of America dominates the research regarding VDR. The highest quality of VDR research was achieved by the University of California System, University of Wisconsin System, and Harvard University. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol, PLoS One, and J Biol Chem are the leading three productive journals on VDR. Various aspects of vitamin D deficiency associated disorders and genetic studies regarding VDR, including single nucleotide polymorphism, gene variants, epigenome, long non-coding ribonucleic acid (lncRNA), and small nucleolar RNA host gene 6 are potentially the recent research hotspot in this field. Moreover, coronavirus disease, polycystic ovary syndrome, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, gut microbiota, gestational diabetes, systemic sclerosis, and chemoresistance are the trending medical conditions associated with VDR.

1. Bikle, DD . Vitamin D metabolism, mechanism of action, and clinical applications. Chem Biol 2014; 21: 319–329.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Thacher, TD, Clarke, BL. Vitamin D insufficiency. Mayo Clin Proc 2011; 86: 50–60.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI3. Bouillon, R, Schuit, F, Antonio, L, et al. Vitamin D binding protein: a historic overview. Front Endocrinol 2019; 10: 910.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Abouzid, M, Karazniewicz-Lada, M, Glowka, F. Genetic determinants of vitamin D-related disorders; focus on vitamin D receptor. Curr Drug Metab 2018; 19: 1042–1052.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Gil, Á, Plaza-Diaz, J, Mesa, MD. Vitamin D: classic and novel actions. Ann Nutr Metab 2018; 72: 87–95.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Abouzid, M, Kruszyna, M, Burchardt, P, et al. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and vitamin D status in population of patients with cardiovascular disease–A preliminary study. Nutrients 2021; 13: 3117. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13093117
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Holick, MF . Vitamin D: importance in the prevention of cancers, type 1 diabetes, heart disease, and osteoporosis. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 79: 362–371.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI8. Kowalówka, M, Główka, AK, Karaźniewicz-łada, M, et al. Clinical significance of analysis of vitamin D status in various diseases. Nutrients 2020; 12: 1–31.
Google Scholar | Crossref9. Abouzid, M, Karaźniewicz-łada, M, Pawlak, K, et al. Measurement of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D2, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in population of patients with cardiovascular disease by UPLC-MS/MS method. J Chromatogr B 2020; 1159: 122350.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Law, J, Bauin, S, Courtial, JP, et al. Policy and the mapping of scientific change: a co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification. Scientometrics 1988; 14: 251–264.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI11. van Eck, NJ, Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010; 84: 523–538.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI12. Hartigan, JA . Direct clustering of a data matrix. J Am Stat Assoc 1972; 67: 123–129.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI13. Brüggmann, D, Alafi, A, Jaque, J, et al. World-wide research architecture of vitamin D research: density-equalizing mapping studies and socio-economic analysis. Nutr J 2018; 17: 3.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Yang, A, Lv, Q, Chen, F, et al. Identification of recent trends in research on vitamin D: a quantitative and co-word analysis. Med Sci Monit 2019; 25: 643–655.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Moral-Muñoz, JA, Herrera-Viedma, E, Santisteban-Espejo, A, et al. Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: an up-to-date review. Prof Inform 2020; 29: 1699–2407.
Google Scholar16. Xing, D, Zhao, Y, Dong, S, et al. Global research trends in stem cells for osteoarthritis: a bibliometric and visualized study. Int J Rheum Dis 2018; 21: 1372–1384.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Morrison, NA, Qi, JC, Tokita, A, et al. Prediction of bone density from vitamin D receptor alleles. Nature 1994; 367: 284–287.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI18. Haussler, MR, Whitfield, GK, Haussler, CA, et al. The nuclear vitamin D receptor: biological and molecular regulatory properties revealed. J Bone Miner Res 1998; 13: 325–349.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI19. McDonnell, D, Mangelsdorf, D, Pike, J, et al. Molecular cloning of complementary DNA encoding the avian receptor for vitamin D. Science 1987; 235: 1214–1217.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Haussler, MR, Mangelsdorf, DJ, Komm, BS, et al. Molecular biology of the vitamin D hormone. Recent Prog Horm Res 1988; 44: 263–305.
Google Scholar | Medline21. Evans, R . The steroid and thyroid hormone receptor superfamily. Science 1988; 240: 889–895.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI22. Uitterlinden, AG, Fang, Y, Van Meurs, JB, et al. Genetics and biology of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms. Gene 2004; 338: 143–156.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif