Visualization of the renal artery in kidney transplant patients using time-resolved computed tomography angiography

1. Bruno, S, Remuzzi, G, Ruggenenti, P. Transplant renal artery stenosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15: 134–141.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI2. Buturović-Ponikvar, J . Renal transplant artery stenosis. Nephrol Dial Transpl 2003; 18(Suppl 5): 74–77.
Google Scholar | Crossref3. Seratnahaei, A, Shah, A, Bodiwala, K, et al. Management of transplant renal artery stenosis. Angiology 2011; 62: 219–224.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI4. Biederman, DM, Fischman, AM, Titano, JJ, et al. Tailoring the endovascular management of transplant renal artery stenosis. Am J Transplant 2015; 15: 1039–1049.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Rossi, AP, Vella, JP. Hypertension, living kidney donors, and transplantation: where are we today? Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2015; 22: 154–164.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI6. Tuna, IS, Tatli, S. Contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging of renal vessels. Abdom Img 2014; 39: 875–891.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Gaddikeri, S, Mitsumori, L, Vaidya, S, et al. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic angiography and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant transplant renal artery stenosis. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2014; 43: 162–168.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Luk, SH, Chan, JHM, Kwan, TH, et al. Breath-hold 3D gadolinium-enhanced subtraction MRA in the detection of transplant renal artery stenosis. Clin Radiol 1999; 54: 651–654.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Chan, YL, Leung, CB, Yu, SCH, et al. Comparison of non-breath-hold high resolution gadolinium-enhanced MRA with digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation on allograft renal artery stenosis. Clin Radiol 2001; 56: 127–132.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Dowlatshahi, D, Wasserman, JK, Momoli, F, et al. Evolution of computed tomography angiography spot sign is consistent with a site of active hemorrhage in acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2014; 45: 277–280.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI11. Lehmkul, L, Andres, C, Lucke, C, et al. Dynamic CT angiography after abdominal aortic endovascular aneurysm repair: influence of enhancement patterns and optimal bolus timing on endoleak detection. Radiology 2013; 268: 890–899.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Fisher, MA, Leidner, B, Kartalis, N, et al. Time-resolved computed tomography of the liver: Retrospective, multi-phase image reconstruction derived from volumetric perfusion imaging. Euro Radiol 2014; 24: 151–161.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Helck, A, Bamberg, F, Sommer, WH, et al. Optimized contrast volume for dynamic CT angiography in renal transplant patients using a multiphase CT protocol. Eur J Radiol 2011; 80: 692–698.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. The Measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation dose in CT. AAPM report no. 96, Report of AAP task group 23: CT dosimetry, 2008.
Google Scholar15. Eriksson, P, Mohammed, AA, De Geer, J, et al. Non-invasive investigations of potential renal artery stenosis in renal insufficiency. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25: 3607–3614.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Andersson, M, Jägervall, K, Eriksson, P, et al. How to measure renal artery stenosis—a retrospective comparison of morphological measurement approaches in relation to hemodynamic significance. BMC Med Img 2015; 15: 42. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-015-0086-8.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. van der Molen, AJ, Reimer, P, Dekkers, IA, et al. Post contrast acute kidney injury part 1: definition, clinical features, incidence, role of contrastmedium and risk factors: recomendations for updated ESUR contrast medium safety committee guidelines. Eur Radiol 2018; 28(7): 2845–2855. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5246-5255.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Zeisbrich, M, Kihm, LP, Drüschler, F, et al. When is contrast-enhanced sonography preferable over conventional ultrasound combined with Doppler imaging in renal transplantation? Clin Kidney J 2015; 8: 606–614.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Angeretti, M, Lumia, D, Canì, A, et al. Non-enhanced MR angiography of renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Acta Radiologica 2013; 54: 749–756.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI20. Liang, K-W, Chen, J-W, Huang, H-H, et al. The performance of noncontrast magnetic resonance angiography in detecting renal artery stenosis as compared with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography using conventional angiography as a reference. J Comput Assist Tomography 2017; 41: 619–627.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Bley, TA, François, CJ, Schiebler, ML, et al. Non-contrast-enhanced MRA of renal artery stenosis: validation against DSA in a porcine model. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 547–555.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Eun-Suk, C, Jeong-Sik, Y, Jhii-Hyun, A, et al. CT angiography of the renal arteries: comparison of lower-tube-voltage CTA with moderate-concentration iodinated contrast material and conventional CTA. AJR Am J Roentg 2012; 199: 96–102.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. Morita, S, Matsuzaki, Y, Yamamoto, T, et al. Mid-term outcome of transarterial embolization of renal artery pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula after partial nephrectomy screened by early postoperative contrast-enhanced CT. CVIR Endovascular 2020; 3: 68. DOI: 10.1186/s42155-020-00160-z.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Althoff, CE, Günther, RW, Hamm, B, et al. Intra-arterial ultra low iodine CT angiography of renal transplant arteries. CardioVascular Interv Radiol 2014; 37: 1062–1067.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Lanzman, RS, Voiculescu, A, Walther, C, et al. ECG-gated nonenhanced 3D steady-state free precession MR angiography in assessment of transplant renal arteries: comparison with DSA. Radiology 2009; 252: 914–921.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI26. Katzberg, RW, Newhouse, JH. Intravenous contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity: is the medical risk really as great as we have come to believe? Radiology 2010; 256: 21–28.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI27. Ehrmann, S, Badin, J, Savath, L, et al. Acute kidney injury in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2013; 41: 1017–1026.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline28. Cheungpasitporn, W, Thongprayoon, C, Mao, MA, et al. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury in kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Transplant 2017; 7: 81–87.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline29. Lee, J, Cho, JY, Lee, HJ, et al. Contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography in Korea: a multi-institutional study in 101487 patients. Korean J Radiol 2014; 15: 456–463.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI30. Nyman, U, Almén, T, Jacobsson, B, et al. Are intravenous injections of contrast media really less nephrotoxic than intra-arterial injections? Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 1366–1371.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif