1. Thomas, R, Chalkiduo. Cost-effectiveness analysis. In: Cylus, J, Papanicolas, I, Smith, PC (eds) Health system efficiency: how to make measurement matter for policy and management. Copenhagen, Denmark: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 2016.
Google Scholar2. Chapman, RA, Somani, BK, Robertson, A, et al. Decreasing cost of flexible ureteroscopy: single-use laser fiber cost analysis. Urology 2014; 83: 1003–1005.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Ozimek, T, Schneider, MH, Hupe, MC, et al. Retrospective cost analysis of a single-center reusable flexible ureterorenoscopy program: a comparative cost simulation of disposable fURS as an alternative. J Endourol 2017; 31: 1226–1230.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Schoenthaler, M, Wilhelm, K, Hein, S, et al. Ultra-mini PCNL versus flexible ureteroscopy: a matched analysis of treatment costs (endoscopic and disposables) in patients with renal stones 10-20 mm. World J Urol 2015; 33: 1601–1605.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Dindo, Demartines, N, Clavien, PA. Classification of surgical complications- a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205–213.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Fred, HL . Cutting the cost of health care: the physician’s role. Tex Heart Inst J 2016; 43: 4–6.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Blake, W, Duerkop, L, McNally, P. Measuring cost savings in the operating room: a matter of FOCUS (follow-through, obsolescence, control, utilization, standardization). Hosp Mater Manage Q 1990; 12: 9–15.
Google Scholar | Medline8. Zhang, H, Hong, TY, Li, G, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of ultra-mini PCNL, flexible ureteroscopy, and shock wave lithotripsy on the treatment of 1-2 cm lower pole renal calculi. Urol Int 2019; 102: 153–159.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline