Does midwifery-led care demonstrate care ethics: A template analysis

1. MacLellan, J . Claiming an ethic of care for midwifery. Nurs Ethics 2014; 21(7): 803–811.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI2. Newnham, E, Kirkham, M. Beyond autonomy: care ethics for midwifery and the humanization of birth. Nurs Ethics 2019; 26(7–8): 2147–2157.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI3. Clesse, C, Lighezzolo-Alnot, J, de Lavergne, S, et al. The evolution of birth medicalisation: a systematic review. Midwifery 2018; 66: 161–167.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Benyamini, Y, Molcho, ML, Dan, U, et al. Women’s attitudes towards the medicalization of childbirth and their associations with planned and actual modes of birth. Women Birth 2017; 30(5): 424–430.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Cole, L, LeCouteur, A, Feo, R, et al. ‘Trying to give birth naturally was out of the question’: accounting for intervention in childbirth. Women Birth 2019; 32(1): e95–e101.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Freedman, LP, Kujawski, SA, Mbuyita, S, et al. Eye of the beholder? Observation versus self-report in the measurement of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth. Reprod Health Matters 2018; 26(53): 107–122.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. World Health Organization (WHO) . The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth. Geneva: WHO, 2014.
Google Scholar8. International Confederation of Midwives . International code of ethics for midwives. Hague: International Confederation of Midwives, 2014.
Google Scholar9. Gilligan, C . In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
Google Scholar10. Held, V . The ethics of care: personal, political, and global. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Google Scholar11. Klaver, K, van Elst, E, Baart, AJ. Demarcation of the ethics of care as a discipline. Nurs Ethics 2014; 21(7): 755–765.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI12. Leget, C, van Nistelrooij, I, Visse, M. Beyond demarcation: care ethics as an interdisciplinary field of inquiry. Nurs Ethics 2019; 26(1): 17–25.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI13. Tronto, JC . Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge, 1993.
Google Scholar14. Vosman, F, Niemeijer, A. Rethinking critical reflection on care: late modern uncertainty and the implications for care ethics. Med Health Care Philos 2017; 20(4): 465–476.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Klaver, K, Baart, A. Attentiveness in care: towards a theoretical framework. Nurs Ethics 2011; 18(5): 686–693.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI16. Osuji, PI . Relational autonomy in informed consent (RAIC) as an ethics of care approach to the concept of informed consent. Med Health Care Philos 2018; 21(1): 101–111.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. de Vries, M, Leget, CJ. Ethical dilemmas in elderly cancer patients: a perspective from the ethics of care. Clin Geriatr Med 2012; 28(1): 93–104.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Brooks, J, McCluskey, S, Turley, E, et al. The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qual Res Psychol 2015; 12(2): 202–222.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Harvey, N, Holmes, CA. Nominal group technique: an effective method for obtaining group consensus. Int J Nurs Pract 2012; 18(2): 188–194.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Borrelli, SE, Spiby, H, Walsh, D. The kaleidoscopic midwife: a conceptual metaphor illustrating first-time mothers’ perspectives of a good midwife during childbirth. Midwifery 2016; 39: 103–111.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Bradfield, Z, Hauck, Y, Kelly, M, et al. ‘It’s what midwifery is all about’: western Australian midwives’ experiences of being ‘with woman’ during labour and birth in the known midwife model. BMC Preg Childbirth 2019; 19(1): 29.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Davison, C, Hauck, YL, Bayes, SJ, et al. The relationship is everything: women’s reasons for choosing a privately practising midwife in Western Australia. Midwifery 2015; 31(8): 772–778.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. Grigg, CP, Tracy, SK, Schmied, V, et al. Women’s birthplace decision-making, the role of confidence: part of the Evaluating Maternity Units study, New Zealand. Midwifery 2015; 31(6): 597–605.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Dahlberg, U, Persen, J, Skogås, AK, et al. How can midwives promote a normal birth and a positive birth experience? The experience of first-time Norwegian mothers. Sex Reprod Healthc 2016; 7: 2–7.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Aannestad, M, Herstad, M, Severinsson, E. A meta-ethnographic synthesis of qualitative research on women’s experience of midwifery care. Nurs Health Sci 2020; 22(2): 171–183.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline26. Raipuria, HD, Lovett, B, Lucas, L, et al. A literature review of midwifery-led care in reducing labor and birth interventions. Nurs Womens Health 2018; 22(5): 387–400.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. Perriman, N, Davis, DL, Ferguson, S. What women value in the midwifery continuity of care model: a systematic review with meta-synthesis. Midwifery 2018; 62: 220–229.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline28. O’Brien, D, Casey, M, Butler, MM. Women’s experiences of exercising informed choices as expressed through their sense of self and relationships with others in Ireland: a participatory action research study. Midwifery 2018; 65: 58–66.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif