1. Covas Moschovas, M, Bhat, S, Onol, F, et al. Early outcomes of single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: lessons learned from the learning-curve experience: early outcomes of SP RARP. BJU Int. Epub ahead of print 2 August 2020. DOI: 10.1111/bju.15158
Google Scholar | Crossref2. Covas Moschovas, M, Bhat, S, Rogers, T, et al. Technical modifications necessary to implement the da Vinci single-port robotic system. Eur Urol 2020; 78: 415–423.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Abaza, R, Murphy, C, Bsatee, A, et al. Single-port robotic surgery allows same-day discharge in majority of cases. Urology. Epub ahead of print 17 November 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.092
Google Scholar | Crossref4. Dy, GW, Jun, MS, Blasdel, G, et al. Outcomes of gender affirming peritoneal flap vaginoplasty using the Da Vinci single port versus Xi robotic systems. Eur Urol. Epub ahead of print 2 July 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.040
Google Scholar | Crossref5. Lenfant, L, Kim, S, Aminsharifi, A, et al. Floating docking technique: a simple modification to improve the working space of the instruments during single-port robotic surgery. World J Urol. Epub ahead of print 29 June 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03307-8
Google Scholar | Crossref6. Kaouk, J, Aminsharifi, A, Sawczyn, G, et al. Single-port robotic urological surgery using purpose-built single-port surgical system: single-institutional experience with the first 100 cases. Urology 2020; 140: 77–84.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Steinberg, RL, Johnson, BA, Meskawi, M, et al. Magnet-assisted robotic prostatectomy using the da Vinci SP robot: an initial case series. J Endourol 2019; 33: 829–834.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Wilson, M, Badani, K. Competing robotic systems. Urol Clin North Am 2021; 48: 147–150.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Amanov, E, Ropella, DS, Nimmagadda, N, et al. Transurethral anastomosis after transurethral radical prostatectomy: a phantom study on intraluminal suturing with concentric tube robots. IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics 2020; 2: 578–581.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Nikolavsky, D, Blakely, SA, Hadley, DA, et al. Open reconstruction of recurrent vesicourethral anastomotic stricture after radical prostatectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 2014; 46: 2147–2152.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI11. McKibben, MJ, Shakir, N, Fuchs, JS, et al. Erosion rates of 3.5-cm artificial urinary sphincter cuffs are similar to larger cuffs. BJU Int 2019; 123: 335–341.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Keihani, S, Chandrapal, JC, Peterson, AC, et al. Outcomes of urethroplasty to treat urethral strictures arising from artificial urinary sphincter erosions and rates of subsequent device replacement. Urology 2017; 107: 239–245.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Granieri, MA, Weinberg, AC, Sun, JY, et al. Robotic Y-V plasty for recalcitrant bladder neck contracture. Urology 2018; 117: 163–165.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Avallone, MA, Quach, A, Warncke, J, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic subtrigonal inlay of buccal mucosal graft for treatment of refractory bladder neck contracture. Urology 2019; 130: 209.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Boswell, TC, Hebert, KJ, Tollefson, MK, et al. Robotic urethral reconstruction: redefining the paradigm of posterior urethroplasty. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9: 121–131.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Kirshenbaum, EJ, Zhao, LC, Myers, JB, et al. Patency and incontinence rates after robotic bladder neck reconstruction for vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis and recalcitrant bladder neck contractures: the trauma and urologic reconstructive network of surgeons experience. Urology 2018; 118: 227–233.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Parekh, DJ, Reis, IM, Castle, EP, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Lond Engl 2018; 391: 2525–2536.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Murthy, PB, Bryk, DJ, Lee, BH, et al. Robotic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion: beyond the initial experience. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9: 942–948.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Hussein, AA, May, PR, Jing, Z, et al. Outcomes of intracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the international robotic cystectomy consortium. J Urol 2018; 199: 1302–1311.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Ericson, KJ, Thomas, LJ, Zhang, JH, et al. Uretero-enteric anastomotic stricture following radical cystectomy: a comparison of open, robotic extracorporeal, and robotic intracorporeal approaches. Urology 2020; 144: 130–135.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Hussein, AA, Elsayed, AS, Aldhaam, NA, et al. A comparative propensity score-matched analysis of perioperative outcomes of intracorporeal vs extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. BJU Int 2020; 126: 265–272.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Rocco, B, Luciani, LG, Collins, J, et al. Posterior reconstruction during robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder: description and outcomes of a simple step. J Robot Surg. Epub ahead of print 29 June 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01108-0
Google Scholar | Crossref23. Kaouk, J, Garisto, J, Eltemamy, M, et al. Single-port robotic intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion during radical cystectomy using the sp surgical system: step-by-step technique. Urology 2019; 130: 196–200.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Grilo, N, Chartier-Kastler, E, Grande, P, et al. Robot-assisted supratrigonal cystectomy and augmentation cystoplasty with totally intracorporeal reconstruction in neurourological patients: technique description and preliminary results. Eur Urol. Epub ahead of print 2 October 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.08.005
Google Scholar | Crossref25. Nezhat, C, Nezhat, F, Green, B. Laparoscopic treatment of obstructed ureter due to endometriosis by resection and ureteroureterostomy: a case report. J Urol 1992; 148: 865–868.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline26. Asghar, AM, Lee, RA, Yang, KK, et al. Robot-assisted distal ureteral reconstruction for benign pathology: current state. Investig Clin Urol 2020; 61: S23–S32.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. Skupin, PA, Stoffel, JT, Malaeb, BS, et al. Robotic versus open ureteroneocystostomy: is there a robotic benefit? J Endourol 2020; 34: 1028–1032.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline28. Lee, Z, Moore, B, Giusto, L, et al. Use of indocyanine green during robot-assisted ureteral reconstructions. Eur Urol 2015; 67: 291–298.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline29. Asghar, AM, Lee, Z, Lee, RA, et al. Robotic ureteral reconstruction in patients with radiation-induced ureteral strictures: experience from the collaborative of reconstructive robotic ureteral surgery. J Endourol. Epub ahead of print 21 September 2020. DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0643
Google Scholar | Crossref30. Slawin, J, Patel, NH, Lee, Z, et al. Ureteral reimplantation via robotic nontransecting side-to-side anastomosis for distal ureteral stricture. J Endourol 2020; 34: 836–839.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline31. Zhao, LC, Yamaguchi, Y, Bryk, DJ, et al. Robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction using buccal mucosa. Urology 2015; 86: 634–638.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI32. Lee, Z, Lee, M, Koster, H, et al. A multi-institutional experience with robotic ureteroplasty with buccal mucosa graft: an updated analysis of intermediate-term outcomes. Urology. Epub ahead of print 13 August 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.003
Google Scholar | Crossref33. Zhao, LC, Weinberg, AC, Lee, Z, et al. Robotic ureteral reconstruction using buccal mucosa grafts: a multi-institutional experience. Eur Urol 2018; 73: 419–426.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline34. Jun, MS, Stair, S, Xu, A, et al. A multi-institutional experience with robotic appendiceal ureteroplasty. Urology 2020; 145: 287–291.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline35. Lenfant, L, Wilson, CA, Sawczyn, G, et al. Single-port robot-assisted dismembered pyeloplasty with mini-pfannenstiel or peri-umbilical access: initial experience in a single center. Urology 2020; 143: 147–152.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline36. Kim, S, Fuller, TW, Buckley, JC. Robotic surgery for the reconstruction of transplant ureteral strictures. Urology 2020; 144: 208–213.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline37. Jacoby, A, Maliha, S, Granieri, MA, et al. Robotic davydov peritoneal flap vaginoplasty for augmentation of vaginal depth in feminizing vaginoplasty. J Urol 2019; 201: 1171–1176.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline38. Acar, O, Sofer, L, Dobbs, RW, et al. Single port and multiport approaches for robotic vaginoplasty with the davydov technique. Urology 2020; 138: 166–173.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline39. Cohen, O, Stranix, JT, Zhao, L, et al. Use of a split pedicled gracilis muscle flap in robotically assisted vaginectomy and urethral lengthening for phalloplasty: a novel technique for female-to-male genital reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145: 1512–1515.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline40. Cohen, OD, Dy, GW, Nolan, IT, et al. Robotic excision of vaginal remnant/urethral diverticulum for relief of urinary symptoms following phalloplasty in transgender men. Urology 2020; 136: 158–161.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline41. Bodner-Adler, B, Hanzal, E, Pablik, E, et al. Management of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs) in women following benign gynaecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0171554.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline42. Eilber, KS, Kavaler, E, Rodríguez, LV, et al. Ten-year experience with transvaginal vesicovaginal fistula repair using tissue interposition. J Urol 2003; 169: 1033–1036.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline43. Randazzo, M, Lengauer, L, Rochat, C-H, et al. Best practices in robotic-assisted repair of vesicovaginal fistula: a consensus report from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group for Reconstructive Urology. Eur Urol 2020; 78: 432–442.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline44. Frey, JD, Yu, JW, Cohen, SM, et al. Robotically assisted omentum flap harvest: a novel, minimally invasive approach for vascularized lymph node transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8: e2505.
Google Scholar | Crossref45. Hammond, JB, Howarth, AL, Haverland, RA, et al. Robotic harvest of a rectus abdominis muscle flap after abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63: 1334–1337.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline46. Rajabaleyan, P, Dorfelt, A, Poornoroozy, P, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of perineal hernia after abdominoperineal resection: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 2019; 55: 54–57.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline47. Mekhail, P, Ashrafi, A, Mekhail, M, et al. Robotic parastomal hernia repair with biologic mesh. Urology 2017; 110: 262.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline48. Smith, AL, Scott, EM, Krivak, TC, et al. Dual-console robotic surgery: a new teaching paradigm. J Robot Surg 2013; 7: 113–118.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline49. Billah, MS, Stifelman, M, Munver, R, et al. Single port robotic assisted reconstructive urologic surgery – with the da Vinci SP surgical system. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9: 870–878.