Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2019 , in Drug Statistics series no. 32. 2020, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Canberra AIHW. p. 38-39.

Harper L. Powell J. Pijl E.M.

An overview of forensic drug testing methods and their suitability for harm reduction point-of-care services.

Harm reduction journal. 14: 52Broséus J. Baechler S. Gentile N. Esseiva P.

Chemical profiling: a tool to decipher the structure and organisation of illicit drug markets: an 8-year study in Western Switzerland.

Forensic science international. 266: 18-28

Illicit drug chemical profiling: current and future state.

Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 50: 689-696Esseiva P. Gaste L. Alvarez D. Anglada F.

Illicit drug profiling, reflection on statistical comparisons.

Forensic science international. 207: 27-34Popovic A. Morelato M. Roux C. Beavis A.

Review of the most common chemometric techniques in illicit drug profiling.

Forensic science international. 302109911

Peacock , A. , Karlsson , A. , Uporova , J. , Price , O. , Chan , R. , Swanton , R. , Gibbs , D. , Bruno , R. , Dietze , P. , Lenton , S. , Salom , C. , Degenhardt , L. , Farrell , M. , Australian Drug Trends 2020: Key Findings from the National Ecstasy and Related Drugs Reporting System (EDRS) Interviews. 2020 , National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney: Sydney.

European Monitoring Centre for Drugs Drug Addiction, Recent changes in Europe’s MDMA/ecstasy market. EMCDDA Rapid Communication, 2016 .

Collins M. Huttunen J. Evans I. Robertson J.

Illicit drug profiling: the Australian experience.

Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 39: 25-32

Illicit drug profiling: the Australian experience–revisited.

Australian journal of forensic sciences. 49: 591-604

Variation in forensic DNA profiling success among sampled items and collection methods: a Queensland perspective.

Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. : 1-14van Oorschot R. Szkuta B. Meakin G.E. Kokshoorn B. Goray M.

DNA transfer in forensic science: a review.

Forensic Science International: Genetics. 38: 140-166Lowe A. Murray C. Whitaker J. Tully G. Gill P.

The propensity of individuals to deposit DNA and secondary transfer of low level DNA from individuals to inert surfaces.

Forensic Science International. 129: 25-34Burrill J. Daniel B. Frascione N.

A review of trace “Touch DNA” deposits: Variability factors and an exploration of cellular composition.

Forensic Science International: Genetics. 39: 8-18Goray M. Fowler S. Szkuta B. van Oorschot R.

Shedder status—an analysis of self and non-self DNA in multiple handprints deposited by the same individuals over time.

Forensic Science International: Genetics. 23: 190-196Kanokwongnuwut P. Martin B. Taylor D. Kirkbride K.P. Linacre A.

How many cells are required for successful DNA profiling?.

Forensic Science International: Genetics. 51102453

DNA transfer: review and implications for casework.

Forensic Science International: Genetics. 7: 434-443

Fingerprints from fingerprints.

() Elsevier, Sessa F. Salerno M. Bertozzi G. Messina G. Ricci P. Ledda C. Rapisarda V. Cantatore S. Turillazzi E. Pomara C.

Touch DNA: impact of handling time on touch deposit and evaluation of different recovery techniques: An experimental study.

Scientific reports. 9: 1-9Van Oorschot R.A. Jones M.K.

DNA fingerprints from fingerprints.

Nature. 387 (): 767van Oorschot R.A. Glavich G. Mitchell R.J.

Persistence of DNA deposited by the original user on objects after subsequent use by a second person.

Forensic Science International: Genetics. 8: 219-225Harbison S. Fallow M. Bushell D.

An analysis of the success rate of 908 trace DNA samples submitted to the Crime Sample Database Unit in New Zealand.

Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 40: 49-53

DNA profiling success rates of commonly submitted crime scene items.

Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series. 7: 597-599

Burgoyne , L.A. , et al., Assessment of the utility of obtaining human profiles from drug seizures. 2012 , National Drug Law Enforcement Research Fund (NDLERF): Hobart.

Burgoyne , L.A. , D.E. Catcheside , and K.P. Kirkbride , The bioprofiling of illicit drugs. 2008 , National Drug Law Enforcement Research Fund (NDLERF): Hobart.

A survey of methods and tools for large-scale DNA mixture profiling, in Smart Infrastructure and Applications.

Springer, : 217-248Bleka Ø. Benschop C. Storvik G. Gill P.

A comparative study of qualitative and quantitative models used to interpret complex STR DNA profiles.

Forensic Science International: Genetics. 25: 85-96Buckleton J.S. Bright J.A. Gittelson S. Moretti T.R. Onorato A.J. Bieber F.R. Budowle B. Taylor D.A.

The Probabilistic Genotyping Software STR mix: Utility and Evidence for its Validity.

Journal of forensic sciences. 64: 393-405Moretti T.R. Just R.S. Kehl S.C. Willis L.E. Buckleton J.S. Bright J.A. Taylor D.A. Onorato A.J.

Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.

Forensic Science International: Genetics. 29: 126-144Greytak E.M. Moore C. Armentrout S.L.

Genetic genealogy for cold case and active investigations.

Forensic science international. 299: 103-113

Application of next-generation sequencing technology in forensic science.

Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics. 12: 190-197Young J.M. Power D. Kanokwongnuwut P. Linacre A.

Ancestry and phenotype predictions from touch DNA using massively parallel sequencing.

International Journal of Legal Medicine. 135: 81-89Kanokwongnuwut P. Martin B. Kirkbride K.P. Linacre A.

Shedding light on shedders.

Forensic Science International: Genetics. 36: 20-25Interpreting DNA evidence: statistical genetics for forensic scientists. Vol. 244. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA