Angerer D., September 11 attacks (Internet), History.com Editors, 2018. 〈https://www.history.com/topics/21st-century/9-11-attacks〉.

Biesecker L.G. Bailey-Wilson J.E. Ballantyne J. Baum H. Bieber F.R. Brenner C. Budowle B. Butler J.M. Carmody G. Conneally P.M. Duceman B. Eisenberg A. Forman L. Kidd K.K. Leclair B. Niezgoda S. Parsons T.J. Pugh E. Shaler R. Sherry S.T. Sozer A. Walsh A.

DNA identifications after the 9/11 World Trade Center attack.

Science. 2005; 310: 1122-1123

Bella T., Fearnow B., Remembering America’s second-deadliest plane crash (Internet), The Atlantic. 2011. 〈https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/11/remembering-americas-second-deadliest-plane-crash/248313/〉. (Accessed 12 November 2020).

Taylor A., Ten years since the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami (Internet), The Atlantic. 2014. 〈https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2014/12/ten-years-since-the-2004-indian-ocean-tsunami/100878/〉.

Modern advances in disaster victim identification.

Forensic Sci. Res. 2019; 4: 291-292Corach D. Sala A. Penacino G. Sotelo A.

Mass disasters: rapid molecular screening of human remains by means of short tandem repeats typing.

Electrophoresis. 1995; 16: 1617-1623

Disaster victim identification of military aircrew, 1945-2002.

Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 2003; 74: 1198-1200Elwick K. Bus M. King J. Chang J. Hughes-Stamm S. Budowle B.

Utility of the Ion S5TM and MiSeq FGxTM sequencing platforms to characterize challenging human remains.

Leg. Med. 2019; 41101623Tillmar A. Grandell I. Montelius K.

DNA identification of compromised samples with massive parallel sequencing.

Forensic Sci. Res. 2018; 4: 331-336Turingan R.S. Brown J. Kaplun L. Smith J. Watson J. Boyd D.A. Steadman D.W. Selden R.F.

Identification of human remains using Rapid DNA analysis.

Int J. Leg. Med. 2020; 134: 863-872Turingan R.S. Tan E. Jiang H. Brown J. Estari Y. Krautz-Peterson G. Selden R.F.

Developmental validation of the ANDE 6C system for rapid DNA analysis of forensic casework and DVI samples.

J. Forensic Sci. 2020; 65: 1056-1071Carney C. Whitney S. Vaidyanathan J. Persick R. Noel F. Vallone P.M. Romsos E.L. Tan E. Grover R. Turingan R.S. French J.L. Selden R.F.

Developmental validation of the ANDE rapid DNA system with FlexPlex assay for arrestee and reference bucal swab processing and database searching.

Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2019; 40: 120-130Salceda S. Barican A. Buscaino J. Goldman B. Klevenberg J. Kuhn M. Lehto D. Lin F. Nguyen P. Park C. Pearson F. Pittaro R. Salodkar S. Schueren R. Smith C. Troup C. Tsou D. Vangbo M. Wunderle J. King D.

Validation of a rapid DNA process with the RapidHIT ID system using GlobalFiler Express chemistry, a platform optimized for decentralized testing environments.

Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2017; 28: 21-34

RapidHIT ID system quick reference guide (Internet), ThermoFisher Scientific, 2019. 〈assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets/GSD/brochures/rapidhit-lea-quick-ref-guide-brochure.pdf〉.

Turingan R.S. Vasantgadkar S. Palombo L. Hogan C. Jiang H. Tan E. Selden R.F.

Rapid DNA analysis for automated processing and interpretation of low DNA content samples.

Investig. Genet. 2016; 7: 2Gin K. Tovar J. Bartelink E.J. Kendell A. Milligan C. Willey P. Wood J. Tan E. Turingan R.S. Selden R.F.

The 2018 California wildfires: integration of rapid DNA to dramaticaly accelerate victim identification.

J. Forensic Sci. 2020; 65: 791-799

Homeland Security, Snapshot: rapid DNA identifies conception boat fire victims (Internet), Science and Technology News, 2019. 〈https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/news/2019/12/10/snapshot-rapid-dna-identifies-conception-boat-fire-victims〉.

Kitayama T. Fukagawa T. Watahiki H. Mita Y. Fujii K. Unuma K. Sakurada K. Uemura K. Sekiguchi K. Mizuno N.

Evaluation of Rapid DNA system for buccal swab and disaster victim identification samples.

Leg. Med. 2020; 46101713

Avila L., Stewart S., Berg R., Hagen A., Hurricane Dorian (Internet), National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report, 2020. 〈https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL052019_Dorian.pdf〉.

FBI Laboratory Quality System. DNA Procedures for Preparation and Extraction of Calcified Tissue Samples [Internet]. DNA Standard Operating Procedures. 2015 [cited 2021 Mar 29]. p. 387–96. Available from: https://fbilabqsd.fbi.gov/.

Bregu J. Conklin D. Coronado E. Terrill M. Cotton R. Grgicak C.

Analytical tresholds and sensitivity: establishing RFU tresholds for forensic DNA analysis.

J. Forensic Sci. 2013; 58: 120-129Pooniya S. Lalwani S. Raina A. Millo T. Dogra T. Das

Quality and quantity of extracted deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from preserved soft tissues of putrefied unidentifiable human corpse.

J. Lab. Physicians. 2014; 6 (Jan 19): 031-035

Human tissue preservation for disaster victim identification (DVI) in tropical climates.

Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2012; 6 (Sep): 653-657Sorensen A. Berry C. Bruce D. Gahan M.E. Hughes-Stamm S. McNevin D.

Direct-to-PCR tissue preservation for DNA profiling.

Int. J. Leg. Med. 2016; 130 (May 3): 607-613

Simplified field preservation of tissues for subsequent DNA analyses*.

J. Forensic Sci. 2011; 56 (Jul): 846-852Holt A. Wootton S.C. Mulero J.J. Brzoska P.M. Langit E. Green R.L.

Developmental validation of the Quantifiler® HP and Trio Kits for human DNA quantification in forensic samples.

Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2016; 21 (Mar): 145-157

Appliedbiosystems, Quantifiler HP and Trio DNA Quantification Kits User Guide (Internet), 2017. 〈tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/manuals/4485354.pdf〉.

Vernarecci S. Ottaviani E. Agostino A. Mei E. Calandro L. Montagna P.

Quantifiler ® Trio kit and forensic samples management: a matter of degradation.

Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2015; 16 (May): 77-85Holmes A.S. Houston R. Elwick K. Gangitano D. Hughes-Stamm S.

Evaluation of four commercial quantitative real-time PCR kits with inhibited and degraded samples.

Int. J. Leg. Med. 2018; 132 (May 24): 691-701

A performance study on three qPCR quantification kits and their compatibilities with the 6-dye DNA profiling systems.

Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2018; 33 (Mar): 72-83Rerkamnuaychoke B. Chantratita W. Jomsawat U. Thanakitgosate J. Pattanasak N. Rojanasunan P.

Comparison of DNA extraction from blood stain and decomposed muscle in STR polymorphism analysis.

J. Med. Assoc. Thai. 2000; 83: S82-S88Alaeddini R. Walsh S.J. Abbas A.

Forensic implications of genetic analyses from degraded DNA-A review.

Forensic Sci. Int Genet. 2010; 4: 148-157Hagelberg E. Gray I.C. Jeffreys A.J.

Identification of the skeletal remains of a murder victim by DNA analysis.

Nature. 1991; 352 (Aug): 427-429

DNA recovery and analysis from skeletal material in modern forensic contexts.

Forensic Sci. Res. 2019; 4 (Jan 2): 51-59

Sampling skeletal remains for ancient DNA (aDNA): a measure of success.

Hist. Archaeol. 2006; 40 (Sep 19): 31-49

Preservation and recovery of DNA in postmortem specimens and trace samples.

in: Haglund W. Sorg M. Forensic Taphonomy: the Postmortem Fate of Human Remains. CRC Press, 1997: 109-138

Dental enamel development: proteinases and their enamel matrix substrates.

ISRN Dent. 2013; 2013 (Sep 16): 1-24Hartman D. Benton L. Morenos L. Beyer J. Spiden M. Stock A.

Examples of kinship analysis where Profiler PlusTM was not discriminatory enough for the identification of victims using DNA identification.

Forensic Sci. Int. 2011; 205 (Feb): 64-68